Astronomy Cast

Subscribe

Subscribe
iTunes
HOME FORUM ARCHIVE EDUCATION ABOUT US CONTACT US SUPPORT THE SHOW Astronomy Cast LIVE! *New*
  • Sponsors
  • Advertisements


  • Blogroll

    • Development Blog
    • Documentation
    • Plugins
    • Suggest Ideas
    • Support Forum
    • Themes
    • WordPress Planet

  •                                 



  • Shows Index
    • AAS (28)
    • AAVSO (4)
    • Astrobiology (1)
    • Black Holes (10)
    • Cosmology (6)
    • Earth (1)
    • Galaxies (20)
    • Interviews (4)
    • Kitsch (3)
    • LPSC (33)
    • Mars (6)
    • Moon (8)
    • NASA (16)
    • Outreach (6)
    • Planets (14)
    • Pretty Pictures (12)
    • Satellites (5)
    • Solar System (6)
    • Space Craft (7)
    • Stars (8)
    • STS-123 (7)
    • Surveys (5)
    • Telescopes (7)
    • Uncategorized (23)



  • Collaborators



    Past Shows
    • BAA/AAVSO Day 2: GRB Observations by Amatuers
    • BAA / AAVSO Day 2: Novae & Supernovae for all
    • AAVSO/BAA Day 1: Chasing Rainbows (or Spectra)
    • AAVSO/BAA Day 1: Reaching Out Effectively
    • AAVSO/BAA Day 1: Binary Adventures
    • AAVSO/BAA Day 1: Remote Observing
    • AAVSO/BAA Day 1: Paula and Pulsating White Dwarfs
    • Mars Rovers To Loose Large Portion of Funding
    • LPSC Audio Files: Dusty NASA Pig Skin
    • LPSC Audio Files: From Space Academy to Space
    • STS-123 : Mission Update
    • Habitable Planets Might Need Plate Tectonics
    • How Rough is Rough?
    • Comparitive Planetology
    • It Rained Like Hell on Early Mars, Ted Maxwell
    • Last Day Adventures and What’s to Come
    • Home again
    • Water formed rocks (and valleys) on Mars
    • Enceladus is Hot
    • Fluvial Mars - 1 many (this many take a while)
    • 234
    • Lunar Magnetic Fields
    • News from NASA: Jim Green & Andrew Thomas
    • STS-123 - A Space Geek’s Pilgrimage : Pictures
    • LPSC: Lunar Remote Sensing
    • STS-123 - A Space Geek’s Pilgrimage : Part IV - Launch!
    • Mars got womped
    • LPSC Random with Alan Stern
    • Looking for Life of Mars: A Question of Temperature
    • New Mission: ExoMars
    • LPSC: Organics in the Morning
    • JSC, NASA does science too, right?
    • NASA and JSC, you’re disappointing me
    • LPSC: Mooning away Tuesday
    • JSC on STS-123
    • “To Be An Astronaut”
    • LPSC Meetup
    • LPSC: Crater Carancas Event
    • Space Science Concentrate
    • Johnson Space Centre (or: Playing Hooky on LPSC)
    • A heads up on Day 2
    • Michael Griffin Redux
    • LPSC: Outer Planet Satellites, Not Titan, Not Enceladus
    • LPSC: Scientists agog over Kaguya video
    • Other People Reporting at LPSC
    • SELENE at the Moon
    • MESSENGER at Mercury (part II)
    • Awards and Masursky Lecture: Dr. Robert Pepin
    • LPSC: Mercury MESSENGER (I)
    • LPSC: Mars: Pingos, Polygons and other Puzzles
    • A Brief Observation
    • Emily reports in from LPSC
    • Rebecca’s Journey to the LPSC
    • STS-123 - A Space Geek’s Pilgrimage : Part III - Kennedy Space Center
    • LPSC: Making New Media Make a Lunar Appeal
    • LPSC: A Summary of Near Future Moon Missions
    • LPSC: The Cultural argument of going to the Moon - Religion, Colonialism, and One World
    • LPSC: A discussion of why? (Moon…)
    • LPSC: Returning to the Moon: Reasons (Part 1)
    • Pamela’s Journey to LPSC
    • STS-123 - A Space Geek’s Pilgrimage : Part II
    • 10 Days of Space Science!
    • STS-123 - A Space Geek’s Pilgrimage
    • SIM PlanetQuest
    • PlanetQuest: Exoplanet Exploration
    • The (Galaxy Zoo) Keepers of the Data
    • What about Chandra?
    • AAS #18: Two supernovae, no waiting
    • AAS #17: A rolling moth gathers no stones
    • Cocktails and Gray Hairs Dancing
    • Red Dwarfs Have Teeny Tiny Habitable Zones
    • AAS #16: Bits and Pieces
    • AAS #15: Travisty of Astronomy
    • Gas Cloud on Collision Course with the Milky Way
    • The International Year of Astronomy
    • Fat Black Holes Can Lurk in Thin Galaxies
    • An Observation
    • Super-Neutron Stars are Possible
    • Galaxies: Born Blue, Red when Dead, Fat Die First
    • Galaxy’s Arms are Rotating Backwards
    • Death Echos of Material Destroyed Near a Black Hole
    • AAS #14: Galaxy zoo finds people are screwed up, not the Universe
    • Black Holes Seen Spinning at the Limits Predicted by Einstein
    • The Building Blocks of the Grand Spirals
    • AAS #13: A History of (galactic) Violence
    • AAS #12: Einstein’s Double Bulls-eye
    • A Quartet of Stars, Locked in a Tight Embrace
    • 4 stars within 6 AU
    • Hubble Sees a Double Einstein Ring
    • Dr. Luisa Rebull on Spitzer Space Telescope
    • Supercluster Ruled By the Pull of Dark Matter
    • Beautiful in Death
    • AAS Interviews: Dr. Peter Stockman on the JWST
    • Down the pub with Alaskans*
    • Researchers Find a Planet, Right Where They Expected
    • AAS #11: Pictures!
    • AAS #10: Screaming black holes
    • Some Stars Can Go through a Second Stage of Planet Formation
    • There’s a Lopsided Halo of Antimatter Surrounding the Centre of the Milky Way
    • Google Sky: Now In More Colours
    • There May Be Hundreds of Rogue Black Holes in the Milky Way
    • JWST in Lego!
    • If You Crashed Neptune and Jupiter Together…
    • AAS Day 2, afternoon
    • AAS #9: Black hole jet of doom from Cen A
    • Earth, Barely Habitable?
    • AAS #8: Cosmic mid-life crisis
    • AAS #7: To survey, with love
    • AAS #6: Lonely stars between galaxies
    • AAS #5: Tortured Veil
    • AAS #4: NASA Town Hall
    • AAS #3: NASA Chief Mike Griffin
    • Hidden Quasars - Found!
    • The Universe Held a Party, and We Missed It
    • Beautiful View of the Cygnus Loop
    • NASA, I think we need to talk
    • Astronomy Cast/BAUT Fan Meet-Up
    • Deep and Red
    • AAS #2: Interview with NASA astronaut John Grunsfeld
    • Massive Disk Galaxies Collapsed From a Single Cloud of Gas
    • LSST Press Briefing
    • The Team at Work… Day 1
    • Time Lapse Animation of Galaxy Jets
    • A Powerful Blast From the Distant Past
    • A Snapshot of NASA’s Science Plans
    • Making a Milky Way
    • Blue Blobs - Splat on the sky
    • Invited Session 27: Long Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away (Mike Griffin’s Talk)
    • AAS #1: Hubble Servicing Mission update
    • NASA, Where are you going? And are you taking the shuttle?
    • The Plan to Fix Hubble
    • Grunsfeld’s Magic Gloves
    • Invited Session 2: The Search for Extrasolar Earths
    • To Hubble with Love
    • Can I Pin You?
    • Coming January 5, 2008!


LPSC: Crater Carancas Event

  • March 11th, 2008
  • Like it? Digg-it | Reddit | del.icio.us
by Pamela

APPosting out of order here. I have a ton of notes on this morning’s Moon sessions, but before piecing together pages of lunar science, I want to share something neat: Science results on Crater Carancas. This newest, smallest crater on the planet Earth was formed September 15, 2007 in Peru. The impact site is fairly near Lake Titicaca and the Bolivia border. The path of the meteor through the atmosphere was observed by numerous people, including a group sitting out on a hotel roof a few kilometers from the impact site. The folks presenting, T Kenkmann and P Schultz (links go to their papers), visited the site a few weeks and a few months after the impact to see what could scientifically be learned through interviews and measurements.

As you may have read at the time, there were several reports of toxic fumes associated with this impact, and some fear that it was actually a missile or falling piece of space debris. All these reports and fears appear to be nothing more than over-active imaginations at work. This was a rock. More accurately this was a Rocky Asteroid called a Chondrite (sub type H). This is good news, but a bit troubling. This type of asteroid turned meteor turned meteorite isn’t supposed to be able to make landfall when small. It was thought (using what are called Pancake Models) that these objects burn up in the atmosphere and spread into a cloud of small, unlikely to survive to the ground, pieces.

Clearly, the models were missing something.

This Carancas crater is/was (it’s quickly eroding) about 14 meters in diameter and the ejecta from the impact spread over 300 meters, with one chunk going through the roof of a shed a couple hundred meters from the impact site. While many of the meteor bits were taken by locals, tourists, etc before the scientists got there (you can actually buy some here), the total mass of the meteor bits and dust still at the site when the scientists got there was surprisingly large. It is estimated that the impacting “object” (I’ll explain below) was roughly 1m in size and 1780 kg.

The parent body was likely much larger. Using modeling, it is estimated that a roughly 2ton object hit the atmosphere at 75 degrees. As it passed through the atmosphere braking and breaking took place, with the object fragmenting in such a way that the pieces didn’t have the energy necessary to pass through the  bow shock (a special type of shockwave that comes off the nose of an object passing through a medium). With all the fragments trapped inside the bowshock they were effectively collimated and in many ways acted like a single object, hitting the ground in a stream. The impact contained roughly 62 million joules of kinetic energy, and flung the soil up into a really cool crater. Unfortunately, this object landed on the bank of what was a dry riverbed. As it dug into the earth, it hit the water table (only about 1.5 meters down, and within 15-30 minutes the crater floor was filled with water.

Over the months since the impact the sides of the crater have slumped, objects in the crater rim have slid down, and erosion has taken place. Soon this crater will look like just another watering hole for the local llamas - It will just be a local watering hole surrounded by fascinating dust and rocks. (Samples collected contained glassy particles and lapillus fragments.)

This impact raises some intriguing questions. Objects like this could have hit us often, but because the craters really aren’t all that dramatic, they may have eroded into oblivion before anyone figured out their significance.  Have we been getting casually drizzeled on by Chondrites on the scale of decades (or longer) and just not known it? The newly realized threat these rocky bodies pose to life on Earth needs to be assessed. While this object didn’t cause any significant economic or bodily harm (and in fact appears to be lining a few pockets with green), it could have.  This object did force one farmer to repair a roof, and it could conceivable have destroyed a building if it had hit a support structure (or just hit a weak building). Now, as we map the skies with LINEAR and the upcoming LSST telesocpes, we need to consider broadening our idea of dangerous, and look a bit harder for the rocks that just might decide to impact.




Leave a Reply


       

HOME FORUM ARCHIVE EDUCATION ABOUT US CONTACT US SUPPORT THE SHOW Astronomy Cast LIVE!

Take a facts-based journey through the cosmos.