<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ep. 86: The End of the Universe Part 1: The End of the Solar System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/</link>
	<description>Take a weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos with Astronomy Cast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shelia Merrill</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelia Merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=318#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>hi
uk428yh5w2xspmoh
good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
uk428yh5w2xspmoh<br />
good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=318#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>In some episodes, including this one, you say 500 million years.
In other episodes, you&#039;ve said 50 million years.
Which is it? :-)

(As a more general point, I think it would be a good idea to add a clearly labelled errata section to the show notes any time an error of fact is found in the show.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some episodes, including this one, you say 500 million years.<br />
In other episodes, you&#039;ve said 50 million years.<br />
Which is it? <img src='http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(As a more general point, I think it would be a good idea to add a clearly labelled errata section to the show notes any time an error of fact is found in the show.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxie Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxie Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=318#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>43aguc4v7yadg2be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>43aguc4v7yadg2be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Znaimer</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Znaimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=318#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Hi Fraser, Hi Pamela,

if I remember correctly, you say that in about 500 million years, the sun will grow brighter, boiling the oceans on earth &amp; wiping out most or all of life on earth. The solar models that I&#039;ve seen show the the luminosity of the Sun increasing by perhaps 5% over the next 500 million years. Now we are quickly learning how non-linear atmospheric processes are, so is it some kind of runaway greenhouse gas effect that takes a 5% increase in insolation &amp; produces something like a 30% increase in surface temperature (100 K/300K).

As a secondary question, could you provide an explanation of why the luminosity. effective surface temperature, &amp; radius of the sun all increase over time, while the sun is still on the Main Sequence. I gather this has something to do with the buildup of &quot;ash&#039; (entirely He or other elements too ??), but the connection between the buildup &amp; the increased luminosity is unclear to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fraser, Hi Pamela,</p>
<p>if I remember correctly, you say that in about 500 million years, the sun will grow brighter, boiling the oceans on earth &amp; wiping out most or all of life on earth. The solar models that I&#039;ve seen show the the luminosity of the Sun increasing by perhaps 5% over the next 500 million years. Now we are quickly learning how non-linear atmospheric processes are, so is it some kind of runaway greenhouse gas effect that takes a 5% increase in insolation &amp; produces something like a 30% increase in surface temperature (100 K/300K).</p>
<p>As a secondary question, could you provide an explanation of why the luminosity. effective surface temperature, &amp; radius of the sun all increase over time, while the sun is still on the Main Sequence. I gather this has something to do with the buildup of &#034;ash&#039; (entirely He or other elements too ??), but the connection between the buildup &amp; the increased luminosity is unclear to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Cast</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Cast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=318#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Harmon, I have to say that your comment is one of the funnier things I have heard in a long time. Honestly, if we have the technology to go into the core of the sun and rearrange things while surviving temperatures and pressures capable of sustaining nuclear burning, I suspect we&#039;ll have the technology to just go somewhere else. Sometimes, it&#039;s just easier to move.

But honestly, I think there is some technology we&#039;re not likely to ever achieve. I&#039;m going to blog about this over on StarStryder in a few hours if you want to find out why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harmon, I have to say that your comment is one of the funnier things I have heard in a long time. Honestly, if we have the technology to go into the core of the sun and rearrange things while surviving temperatures and pressures capable of sustaining nuclear burning, I suspect we&#039;ll have the technology to just go somewhere else. Sometimes, it&#039;s just easier to move.</p>
<p>But honestly, I think there is some technology we&#039;re not likely to ever achieve. I&#039;m going to blog about this over on StarStryder in a few hours if you want to find out why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
