<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ep. 6: More Evidence for the Big Bang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/</link>
	<description>Take a weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos with Astronomy Cast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/extragalactic/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>If the big bang really happened then the farther out we look, at some point we should see the big bang, or is it that we just can&#039;t see that far yet? 
point two thats been on my mind- looking farther out, shouldn&#039;t the point of the big bang be funnelled into one place in our sky? if we can look far enough back then more matter should be consolidated in one place in the sky toward the big bang, and I don&#039;t hear we are finding that. The farther out and back into time we look, should be able to reveal the point of the big bang and we should actually be able to see if if we are looking far enough out there, right? 
I think it more probable that the universe is truely infinate in size and we are from a space in the universe that was created by a black hole releasing it&#039;s matter in an explosion creating this portion of the universe. That would explain why the night sky is not all light from distant stars, if portions of it were esencially restarted with black hole explosions.
Just my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the big bang really happened then the farther out we look, at some point we should see the big bang, or is it that we just can&#039;t see that far yet?<br />
point two thats been on my mind- looking farther out, shouldn&#039;t the point of the big bang be funnelled into one place in our sky? if we can look far enough back then more matter should be consolidated in one place in the sky toward the big bang, and I don&#039;t hear we are finding that. The farther out and back into time we look, should be able to reveal the point of the big bang and we should actually be able to see if if we are looking far enough out there, right?<br />
I think it more probable that the universe is truely infinate in size and we are from a space in the universe that was created by a black hole releasing it&#039;s matter in an explosion creating this portion of the universe. That would explain why the night sky is not all light from distant stars, if portions of it were esencially restarted with black hole explosions.<br />
Just my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Cast</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Cast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/extragalactic/more-evidence-for-the-big-bang/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Episode 6: More Evidence for the Big Bang [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Episode 6: More Evidence for the Big Bang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
