<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Astronomy Cast &#187; Stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycast.com/category/astronomy/stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycast.com</link>
	<description>Take a facts-based journey through the universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Take a facts-based journey through the universe.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Take a facts-based journey through the universe.</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 217: Stellar Classification</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2011/04/ep-217-stellar-classification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2011/04/ep-217-stellar-classification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=2203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words? Oh be a fine girl and kiss me. They&#8217;re not being romantic, they&#8217;re trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Let&#8217;s learn what all those letters mean, and what differentiates a type O star from a type [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2011/04/ep-217-stellar-classification/' addthis:title='Ep. 217: Stellar Classification '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words? Oh be a fine girl and kiss me. They&#8217;re not being romantic, they&#8217;re trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Let&#8217;s learn what all those letters mean, and what differentiates a type O star from a type G.</p>
<p><span id="more-2203"></span></p>
<table style="height: 52px;" width="391">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong> </strong><a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/astronomycast/AstroCast-110124.mp3"><strong>Download Ep. 217: Stellar Classification</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a></li>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div id="transcript">
<a name="transcript"><br />
<h3>Transcript: Stellar Classification</h3>
<p></a><strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-110124_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Welcome to Astronomy Cast where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know.  My name is Fraser Cain, I’m the publisher of Universe Today, and with me as always, is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Hi, Pamela.  How are you doing?</p>
<p><b>
<p><b>Pamela:</b></p>
<p></b>  I’m doing well!  How are you doing, Fraser?</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  I’m doing great!  I’ve got nothing else to say.  You have anything interesting to say?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Um, life is good?  </p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  OK, well on that note…</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  There’s a shuttle launch coming?</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  That’s true.  So on that note, let’s continue with the show then.  Chit-chat over!  Chit-chat done!  Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words:  “Oh, be a fine girl and kiss me?”  Now, they’re not being romantic, they’re just trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.  So let’s figure out what all this means, and what differentiates a type O star from a type G star.  Well, I know this is the show that everybody’s been waiting for [laughing]… but sometimes we’ll talk about the really cool, crazy stuff and sometimes we’ll go back to the fundamentals to stop your eyes from glazing over as you flip through the pages of an astronomy book and you see this big picture of all these stars, and you’re like “whatever, whatever that is…I’m moving on.”  No! Stop!  Time to understand it.  That is the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and it is a way of organizing different stellar stages?  Classifications?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Everything about stars:  their fuel, their evolutionary stage, their temperature, how bright they are…it all gets trapped in this one diagram.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And normally, you know, I think we try to let people imagine with their minds, but in this case, if you actually did want to go and Google up yourself a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, that might be helpful as we continue into this conversation, but even, you know, not &#8212; I think there’s enough here for everybody.  Even those of you on a forest walk can envision stars collected into this graph.  Alright, so what are we talking about here, and why does this even matter?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, the reason it matters is for scientists, we need graphs.  We require graphs. And in this one particular case, if you make a graph that are at the same distance and put on one axis how bright they appear, and put on the other axis what temperature they are, what color they are (it’s the same thing), you start ending up with these really nice lines along which the stars naturally clump up, and those lines have physical meaning.  There’s this beautiful, curvy “S” (well, it’s mostly like an “S” that you stretched and stretched and stretched until it was almost a straight line), and that “S” that starts in the upper left-hand corner (it’s kind of rotated 45 degrees) and ends in the lower right-hand corner &#8212; that’s what we call the main sequence of stars, and it’s along that line that all stars that are burning hydrogen in their core, exist, as well as all other stars that are in their first stage of burning nuclear fuels.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  OK, so imagine that graph, the left-hand I guess, the vertical axis is mass?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Vertical axis, well, so mass actually doesn’t play into the diagram that much.  If you look along the diagonals you can get there, but the vertical axis, the Y-axis, is how bright the star appears.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So the vertical axis is brightness, and the horizontal axis is color.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Yes, and we have blue on the left and red on the right, which is hot on the left and cool on the right.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Right, so in the very upper left-hand corner of the graph you’re going to get a star that is very bright and very blue, and in the bottom right-hand corner, you’re going to get a star that is not so bright and red.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Exactly.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And, as you say, you get this line that goes from the upper left-hand corner, quite smoothly moving down towards the lower right-hand corner, although as you say, it’s a bit of an “S.”</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And this curve, one of the things that makes it so important, is how much of this letter “S” we get to see is a function of how old the stellar population we’re looking at happens to be.  So if you look at a very young group of stars, an open cluster, a group of stars that is still in the process of forming, you’ll get all the stars in the upper left-hand corner, and it’s still in the process of forming you’re probably going to be missing some of the stars down in the lower right.  But if you look at an extremely old population of stars, something like a globular cluster, those really hot, really bright, really massive stars in the upper left-hand corner, they’re going to be dead, they’re going to have evolved off this letter “S,” this main sequence, to a different part of the diagram.  So we can actually use this diagram for a cluster of stars to figure out exactly how old that cluster of stars happens to be.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  You look at how many of the stars have evolved off the main sequence.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Exactly – “what’s the “turning point?” is how we talk about it.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So where’s this coming from?  I mean, someone had to have made some kind of realization at some point.  I’m guessing their names are somehow involved in the name of the diagram itself.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  It might just have been, well, I can’t pronounce this poor guy’s first name:  Ejnar Hertzsprung, and then of course, Russell is Norris Russell.  So, these two – Henry Norris Russell – these two astronomers, at the same time, working between 1911 and 1913, came up with the refinements for this diagram.  But what’s interesting is the history behind that “Oh be a fine girl kiss me…”</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  That’s a puzzler!   I mean, what does “O” or “G” have to do with the actual colors?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And the thing that bothered me when I first saw this diagram is why aren’t they in order?  And this all goes back to our understanding of spectral classifications.  People started taking spectral images of stars – this is where you take the starlight and you shine it through a slit, a prism, and “grism,” [sic] and you get many different combinations of things, and as a result, you end up with the light spread out into very fine-grained rainbow, where you can see where light gets absorbed out by the atmosphere of the star and where there’s extra light due to emission lines in the atmosphere of the star.  And we didn’t actually understand that when people started taking stellar spectra.  We didn’t understand what role temperature played when we started taking stellar spectra, and so these were just a really neat way of getting additional information.  These neat lines on the rainbows of these stars and the first people to try and figure out how to sort out what these spectra meant were two of Pickering’s women at Harvard.  So on one hand you had Antonia Maury, who was Henry Draper, the famous Henry Draper of the Draper catalog’s, niece.  And she came up with this really complicated system that looked at the widths of the lines, what the lines were, and it had some basis in physical reality, but we didn’t understand that at the time.  Then there was Wilhelmina Fleming, who looked at the lines and took a very straightforward approach.  She knew what the Hydrogen Balmer series was, she knew what the lines were in the stars, and she classified the stars, such that “A” stars had the most Hydrogen Balmer lines, and as you worked your way down the alphabet, the Balmer lines slowly disappeared.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So, this is where you get like, A, B, C…</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Exactly, except we got rid of some of the classifications:  C went away, D went away…</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Because they just weren’t distinct enough from the others?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, and it turned out that once we understood that the prominence of these different lines has to do with the temperature of the gas, they just weren’t needed.  And so, it was realized “O” stars were, “Oh dear, these were the hottest,” so they got bumped over to the right-hand side of the graph.  And we realized that A stars &#8212; they’re still pretty hot, but they’re a little cooler than the O stars, and the B stars were somewhere in between.  So, as we started to pick out what are all the different lines?  What are all the different spectral lines that correspond to different temperatures in these stellar spectra?  What do they mean?  We’re able to pick it apart and figure out “Oh, if you look at these very particular to hot star lines, you get “O” stars, and “G” if you start looking at how the hydrogen lines have started to get weaker, you get “G” stars.  So we built up this entire classification system based on temperature using the original letters that were ascribed to literally thousands of classified spectra that were classified before we had a good physical meaning for the system.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  But because people were so comfortable with using those letters to describe the stars, they kept them, even though now they’re just not in order anymore.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Exactly, and what’s kind of neat about this story is the woman who sat down and tried to figure out the argument on how to classify spectra &#8212; the disagreement between Antonia Maury’s system, and Wilhelmina Fleming’s system – when she looked at it and came up with the physical interpretations, she initially kind of more than annoyed Antonia Maury who left Harvard for a while, but as she examined it, she realized that Antonia’s usage of the thickness of the lines actually had physical meaning.  When you start making plots that have, not just temperature along one axis, but then you make it 2-dimensional, you add that second axis, you add that luminosity in, she found that the stars that had different thicknesses of lines, these are the dwarf stars, the super giant stars, the sub-dwarfs, these different thicknesses of lines clumped up as well, and had physical meaning as well.  Now we know the thickness of the line is, at least in part, due to how strong gravity is at the surface of the star.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So, why don’t we maybe take a walk down the main sequence anyway, and see where some distinct classifications of stars because, even though it is fairly smooth, they do kind of clump up a bit.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right.  So we have pretty much through the middle of this diagram, the central curvy bit of the “S” if you can imagine the top part of the “S” and the bottom part of the “S” and then you have the two parts in the middle.  Those two parts in the middle are the dwarf stars and our own Sun counts as one of these dwarf stars.  These are stars that are burning hydrogen in their center.  These are stars that usually have additional layers that aren’t completely involved in radioactive processes yet, and they’re nice, happy, generic stars that aren’t’ going to explode in violent ways.  Those are the giant stars that aren’t the red giants, they’re not the super giants, these are just the physically giant stars that exist in the upper left-hand corner.  They very quickly become super giants and blue giants as they very quickly dive off the main sequence before exploding as supernovas.  And then in the bottom part of this diagram, that bottom part of the “S,” we have the red dwarfs.  These are the stars that, in some cases, are involving their entire atmosphere in nuclear burning.  They are completely convective and they’re going to burn their entire store of hydrogen over time, and then very gently cool off into tiny, tiny white dwarfs, and that’s that main “S” part of the curve.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And sorry, just what the letters, the blue stars associate with what?  The “O” and the “B”?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Exactly.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And then in the middle part, it’s the A, F and the G?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  A and F are thought of as being white.  The human eye doesn’t really perceive stars as green at any point.  It’s just the way…stars give off light in all colors, and when we look at a star that might be giving off the majority of its light in the green, it’s giving off light in all colors as well and our eyes are perceiving it as white.  So we have A and F stars are perceived as white by the human eye, and then as we cool off and get into the G and K stars, these are yellow-orange stars, and then it just slowly tapers off into the deep reds as we start to get into the M’s.  And some classification systems will add an L in after that.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And so when you hear about an M dwarf, that is a star, like a red dwarf star that’s in that M classification.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And Barnard’s star is perhaps one of the most famous red dwarfs out there, other than, of course, the spacecraft…</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  [laughing] Right, the TV show…yeah…and again, if you look at the diagram, there is that main sequence we have been talking about and then there are stuff that’s off the main sequence that we’ve talked about.  So what’s going on here?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  So, the easiest part of this to explain is if you jump down below that letter “S”, running parallel to the straight part of this diagram, spanning from just around the letter B and then cooling all the way off is this diagonal line of very, very faint stars.  These are stars the brightness of the red dwarfs, or even fainter, and these little tiny stars that start off at high temperatures and then cool off are all white dwarf stars.  So the death stage of stars like our sun, stars a little bit bigger than our sun, and everything smaller then our sun is a white dwarf, and white dwarfs are the degenerate matter, the stellar fragment that is no longer undergoing any nuclear reaction that we think structurally, in some cases, might actually resemble diamonds.  These are crystalline carbons with electrons and what’s called an electron-degenerate gas.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And so, they do follow their own cluster, but it is away from the rest of the stars because, as you said, they’re no longer actively burning; they’re really just cooling down from what they used to be and I guess the situation is that we only really see them up until the white level because there aren’t many stars, you know, there aren’t many cooler stars that have had a chance to die yet.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Yeah, this is one of those things that people don’t really think about.  In some cases, our understanding of stellar evolution is more advanced than what the universe allows us to look at.  The universe has only been around for 13.7 billion years, and it takes white dwarfs a long time to, first of all, get formed.  You have to wait for the not low mass, but lower than giant giant mass stars to finish their entire life cycle and then you have to wait for these things to cool off to see what is the end stage of their existence.  We believe they just cool off like a barbecue briquette, basically.  So we’re only able to see some parts of this pattern, and they’re faint so that makes them even harder to see, and as they cool off they give off even less light, but they do place a constraint on the age of the universe.  If we see a white dwarf that had to have had longer than the age of the universe to cool off to get where it is on the H-R diagram, we know there is something wrong with our understanding of the universe, but so far that’s never happened, so we’re doing OK.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And then, so that’s one of the off-the-main-sequence, but there’s another one too.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  There are multiple other ones, so the other big one is the red giant branch.  This is where pretty much all the big boys go to die.  That’s kind of the depressing way to look at it, but as stars evolve off the main sequence and proceed to start doing other things, such as burning a shell of hydrogen around their core, they’ll evolve into this diagonal line that comes off of the center of the letter “S.”  And at this stage they’re bloated up, they’re much cooler and they’re now undergoing a different form of burning.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Right, and so they’re bright, according to the graph, but cool.  So they’re more toward that red color, but they’re also then brighter, so they’re…as you said, it’s almost like a cross.  They’re going the other direction from the main sequence.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  So if you imagine just the main sequence and the giant stars we now have a backwards letter “Y” in our diagram.  Now, coming off of that giant branch we have, in some cases, in older systems with just the right combinations, we have a small branch, a horizontal branch extending straight left-right through the H-R diagram, and this is where you end up with stars that have undergone a helium flash in their core.  These are stars that are now burning helium with a shell of hydrogen around them, and depending on exactly what they are in the process of doing, they could either be evolving towards the left, or they could be evolving towards the right, which is one of the things that makes studying stellar evolution particularly confusing at times, because you’re looking at a star and without additional data, you’re not quite sure which way it’s moving in its evolution.  What’s neat is this horizontal branch cuts through what’s called the “region of instability,” which is a region that cuts along a mostly-vertical line through the entire H-R diagram, and stars all along this instability strip pulsate, so on the horizontal branch, stars in this unstable region, these are your RV Tauri stars, these are your pulsating variables.  If you move up the strip there’s another horizontal branch as well, these are the super giant stars.  This is where the largest stars are burning shell after shell after shell of material, and in here you also start to find your Cepheid branch stars.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And so this is where you get your, as you said, when a really giant star first forms, it’s briefly on the main sequence and then puffs up, gets very bright, and can either remain hot or can be cooler, but is completely steps away from all the main sequence brightness color connection.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And they don’t last long.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  No, not at all!  And what’s neat is across this entire diagram, if you’re able to get the mass of the star and you’re able to plot its point on the diagram, you can get all sorts of information &#8212; from what it’s burning in its core, to where it’s been in its life, to what’s likely to happen to it in the future.  Using this diagram, we are able to use populations of stars to understand the lives of individual stars.  When we use the H-R diagram, we’ll say, “OK, let’s look at that globular cluster &#8212; all the stars are about the same distance, they’re all made of about the same stuff,” and so the only things that makes these stars different from one another is their mass.  Now we can look at multiple globular clusters to figure how does the H-R diagram differ?  How does stellar evolution differ as a function of mass for systems that have slightly different amounts of metals, and slightly different amounts of iron and other metals (every element other than hydrogen and helium, we consider metal), but putting together the pictures of all these systems at different ages, all these systems at different “metallicities,” we can start to say very specifically a star like our sun will have this specific future, and that’s kind of neat to learn all from a graph.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  It’s interesting to me how you can show an astronomer a star and they’ll know what the color is by analyzing the light, and then they can look at what the apparent brightness is and then they can know roughly how far away the star is because they know how bright, based on this graph, a star like that should be, or they can know what stage of evolution it’s in.  They can guess at its mass because they have this great relationship on this graph.  It’s amazing what an astronomer can figure out, and I can see how what’s really fascinating is what are the nuances?  How is it different?  As you said, you look at one globular cluster, and the stars have all taken some strange shared direction down the H-R diagram, well, it’s different from a different cluster, so there’s these similarities and these differences, and that I’m sure tells these astronomers tons!</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  It’s strange to think that one graph, one lousy graph that we torture students with by making them make them, by showing them plots of the nearest stars – this one graph holds so many keys to our understanding of the universe.  We use it for everything.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Now, is this the only way that astronomers will express this kind of thing?  Are there other graphs like this that people might encounter?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  When it comes to trying to understand stars, we make pretty much consistently graphs of color or temperature or spectral type, which are three different ways of saying the same type of information vs. the &#8212; in an ideal situation &#8212; the absolute magnitude or total luminosity of the stars.  And when we don’t have that information, if we’re looking at stars that are all the same distance, we’ll just make a plot vs. how bright they appear to be.  That’s pretty much what we do.  We call it different names at times.  We call it color magnitude diagrams or H-R diagrams, but it’s really the same thing.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And I guess neutron stars, black holes, they don’t show up on these.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  No, not so much &#8212; neutron stars you could figure out where to put them, but they’re just cooling off as well, and they’re generally not known for being observed by how bright they appear.  We like to look at how brightly they pulse instead.  It’s just a different way of starting to consider things.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  What about objects that are…before they’re forming as stars?  You know like T-Tauri objects, things like that?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  So objects &#8212; proto-stars &#8212; as they’re in the process of forming, these objects start off slightly cooler and slightly brighter in some cases, and so they drop on to the main sequence.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  …as opposed to branching off, that’s interesting.  Alright, well I think that’s good!  Hopefully, now, everyone when they see an H-R diagram will know what they’re looking at, and not just flip the page immediately.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  It’s a graph, but it’s a good graph.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  It’s key, so…well, thanks a lot!</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Thank you.  Talk to you later.</p>
<p>
</p>
</div>
<p><small>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file. It has been edited for clarity. </small></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2011/04/ep-217-stellar-classification/' addthis:title='Ep. 217: Stellar Classification '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2011/04/ep-217-stellar-classification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/astronomycast/AstroCast-110124.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words? Oh be a fine girl and kiss me. They&#039;re not being romantic, they&#039;re trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words? Oh be a fine girl and kiss me. They&#039;re not being romantic, they&#039;re trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Let&#039;s learn what all those letters mean, and what differentiates a type O star from a type G.






	 Download Ep. 217: Stellar Classification
	Jump to Shownotes
	Jump to Transcript





Transcript: Stellar ClassificationDownload the transcript

Fraser:  Welcome to Astronomy Cast where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know.  My name is Fraser Cain, I’m the publisher of Universe Today, and with me as always, is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville.

Fraser:  Hi, Pamela.  How are you doing?

Pamela:  I’m doing well!  How are you doing, Fraser?

Fraser:  I’m doing great!  I’ve got nothing else to say.  You have anything interesting to say?

Pamela:  Um, life is good?  

Fraser:  OK, well on that note…

Pamela:  There’s a shuttle launch coming?

Fraser:  That’s true.  So on that note, let’s continue with the show then.  Chit-chat over!  Chit-chat done!  Have you ever heard an astronomer utter these words:  “Oh, be a fine girl and kiss me?”  Now, they’re not being romantic, they’re just trying to remember the different ways to organize stars, as detailed nicely on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.  So let’s figure out what all this means, and what differentiates a type O star from a type G star.  Well, I know this is the show that everybody’s been waiting for [laughing]… but sometimes we’ll talk about the really cool, crazy stuff and sometimes we’ll go back to the fundamentals to stop your eyes from glazing over as you flip through the pages of an astronomy book and you see this big picture of all these stars, and you’re like “whatever, whatever that is…I’m moving on.”  No! Stop!  Time to understand it.  That is the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and it is a way of organizing different stellar stages?  Classifications?

Pamela:  Everything about stars:  their fuel, their evolutionary stage, their temperature, how bright they are…it all gets trapped in this one diagram.

Fraser:  And normally, you know, I think we try to let people imagine with their minds, but in this case, if you actually did want to go and Google up yourself a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, that might be helpful as we continue into this conversation, but even, you know, not -- I think there’s enough here for everybody.  Even those of you on a forest walk can envision stars collected into this graph.  Alright, so what are we talking about here, and why does this even matter?

Pamela:  Well, the reason it matters is for scientists, we need graphs.  We require graphs. And in this one particular case, if you make a graph that are at the same distance and put on one axis how bright they appear, and put on the other axis what temperature they are, what color they are (it’s the same thing), you start ending up with these really nice lines along which the stars naturally clump up, and those lines have physical meaning.  There’s this beautiful, curvy “S” (well, it’s mostly like an “S” that you stretched and stretched and stretched until it was almost a straight line), and that “S” that starts in the upper left-hand corner (it’s kind of rotated 45 degrees) and ends in the lower right-hand corner -- that’s what we call the main sequence of stars, and it’s along that line that all stars that are burning hydrogen in their core, exist, as well as all other stars that are in their first stage of burning nuclear fuels.

Fraser:  OK, so imagine that graph, the left-hand I guess, the vertical axis is mass?

Pamela:  Vertical axis, well, so mass actually doesn’t play into the diagram that much.  If you look along the diagonals you can get there, but the vertical axis, the Y-axis, is how bright the star appears.

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 158: Pulsars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/11/ep-158-pulsars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/11/ep-158-pulsars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compact Objects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine an object with the mass of the Sun, crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now set that object spinning hundreds of times a second, blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#8217;s a pulsar, one of the most exotic objects in the Universe. Ep. 158: Pulsars Jump to Shownotes Jump to [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/11/ep-158-pulsars/' addthis:title='Ep. 158: Pulsars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1001" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1001" title="Artist's illustration of a pulsar" src="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pulsar-150x150.jpg" alt="Artist's illustration of a pulsar" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Artist&#39;s illustration of a pulsar</p></div>
<p>Imagine an object with the mass of the Sun, crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now set that object spinning hundreds of times a second, blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#8217;s a pulsar, one of the most exotic objects in the Universe.</p>
<p><span id="more-1000"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-091005.mp3">Ep. 158: Pulsars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> </li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/NEWHOME/help/tutorials/pulsar.htm">Pulsar Tutorial</a> &#8212; Science@NASA</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l2/pulsars.html">Pulsars -</a>- Goddard SFC</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/pulsars/pulsars.html">Pulsars</a> &#8212; UTK</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/pulsars.html">Neutron Stars VS. Pulsars </a></li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/solarsys/angmom.html">Conservation of Angular Momentum</a> &#8212; UTK</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2006/mspulsar/">Fast spinning pulsars (millisecond pulsars)</a> &#8211;NRAO</li>
<li><a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1974/press.html">1974 Nobel Prize in Physics to Antony Hewish for the discovery of pulsars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~cwp/Phase2/Burnell,_Jocelyn_Bell@841234567.html">Jocelyn Bell Burnell</a> &#8212; UCLA</li>
<li><a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1993/press.html">1993 Nobel Prize in Physics to Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor for discovery of binary pulsars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.drphysics.com/syllabus/gravrad/gravrad.html">Gravitational Radiation </a>&#8211; DrPhysics</li>
<li><a href="http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/crab-neb.htm">Crab Nebula Pulsar</a> &#8212; SolStation</li>
<li><a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002nsps.conf...44S">Paper:  Why Study Pulsars Optically; A. Shearer &amp; A. Golden</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.howstuffworks.com/planet-hunting2.htm">Planet Hunting </a>&#8211; How Stuff Works</li>
<li><a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/P/PSR1257+12.html">Discovery of PSR1257+12 by Alexander Wolszczam and Dale Frail</a> &#8212; Internet Ency. of Science</li>
<li><a href="http://www.extrasolar.net/planettour.asp?PlanetID=26">Pulsar Planet Star System </a>&#8211; Extrasolar Vision</li>
<li><a href="http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/media/releases/ssc2006-10/ssc2006-10v1.shtml">Pulsar 4U 0142+61 with protoplanetary disk</a> &#8212; Spitzer</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2005/02/18/fastest-spinning-pulsar-found/">Fastest Spinning Pulsar IGR J00291+5934 </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar">Magnetar</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050927_star_cracked.html">Magnetar that &#8220;blinded&#8221; satellites in 2004</a> &#8212; Space.com</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="transcript">
<a name="transcript"><br />
<h3>Transcript: Pulsars</h3>
<p></a><strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-091005_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Astronomy Cast Episode 158 for Monday October 5, 2009:  Pulsars. Welcome to Astronomy Cast, our weekly facts-based journey through the Cosmos, where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know. My name is Fraser Cain, I&#8217;m the publisher of Universe Today, and with me is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Hey, Pamela.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> Hey Fraser, how&#8217;s it going?
</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Good. Pulsars! So, imagine an object with the mass of the sun crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now, set that object spinning&#8230;hundreds of times per second&#8230; blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#8217;s a pulsar&#8230;one of the most exotic objects in the universe. Alright, Pamela, so maybe you can give another equally gripping description of what a pulsar is.  If we could see a pulsar, what would we see? </p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> The coolest thing about this is if you took a thimbleful of the surface and looked at just that one thimbleful of the surface, it would weigh a hundred million tons, and it would be going around and around something the circumference of Manhattan roughly&#8230; something about 12 miles in diameter&#8230;as fast as 1000 times per second. It&#8217;s kind of extreme!</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Yeah&#8230;yeah. Well, then I think we need to go back first and hear the story&#8230;just where do these things come from?
</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> Well, when a mommy and daddy star get together&#8230;</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> So, where do we get a pulsar from?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> There&#8217;s actually 2 different general species of pulsars. In one case, you take a big ol&#8217; star and you let it die violently as a supernova. In some cases you end up left behind this core of the star that contains all of its angular momentum. You take all of that rotational energy, keep it&#8230;at least keep most of it&#8230;and set it loose rotating something that&#8217;s way smaller. So this is the equivalent of taking your ice skater who has her arms spread out straight and not only having her wrap her arms around her body, but have her body suddenly become smaller than a piece of spaghetti around. So not only does the speed increase a little, it increases a whole lot with that conservation of angular momentum. </p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> So a pulsar was once a star, it detonated as a supernova, and you&#8217;re just left with some super-dense core that remains, but it still has all of the spinning that it had when it was a big star. </p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> In the case of pulsars, they also have a magnetic field. Magnetic fields are one of those things that when you try to explain them, people get confused and it&#8217;s hard. But they have these really powerful magnetic fields that aren&#8217;t fully understood, that aren&#8217;t lined up with the rotational axis of the star. This is the same thing that we have here on Earth&#8230;the Earth&#8217;s north pole and south pole according to rotation and according to your compass aren&#8217;t the same place. </p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Now you said two ways to get them&#8230;one was an exploding star&#8230;</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> And the other is that you wait a while and that exploding star will&#8230;you had a nice fast rotating pulsar&#8230;it&#8217;s going to slow down, slow down, slow down. But then if you add mass to its surface, if you put it into a system where it either has winds from a nearby companion star blowing on it and dumping matter onto its surface, or where it&#8217;s stripping matter off of a nearby companion star through gravitational pull and filling of what we call the Roche Lobe, that extra material falling onto the neutron star can also spin it back up, get it moving fast yet again&#8230;a recycled pulsar is one way they get referred to. These are the x-ray pulsars. We have the high-speed pulsars like the one inside the Crab Nebula that are rotating away because they&#8217;re young, and that&#8217;s just what young dead neutron stars do is they rotate quickly. But then we also have the recycled ones that have lived a second life that are now also emitting in the x-ray that are rotating quickly because of extra matter that has gotten dumped onto them.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Right.  And we&#8217;ve done a few shows on this already that a pulsar is &#8212; for all intents and purposes &#8212; a neutron star, but it has some different behavior from a neutron star, which is what makes it a pulsar. So then, what&#8217;s it made out of?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> Well, neutron stars are made of neutrons, basically. This is where you have material that is so dense that the electrons and protons no longer can hold themselves apart. You have white dwarf stars, which are where you pack as many protons and electrons together as you possibly can.  Well, if you try to pack them a little bit closer together, if you increase the mass to the point that the electrons and protons can no longer keep themselves apart, then they smoosh together and become neutrons.  Neutrons are only stable in these extremely dense environments, or when they&#8217;re down in the centers of atoms. Now, outside of this neutron star there&#8217;s roughly a mile-thick crust of other stuff. Now, what&#8217;s cool about neutron stars is occasionally they glitch. So in general, one of the awesome things about pulsars is that they&#8217;re out there rotating, rotating, rotating, and the fastest ones&#8230;they&#8217;ll rotate 500 times a second, 600 times a second, 700 times a second&#8230;most of them aren&#8217;t that fast. But in general, all of them are so consistent that they make some of the best clocks in the entire universe. We can look out and be looking at one of these high-speed pulsars and slight variations on the surface of the planet Earth suddenly become measurable as timing changes in the pulsar. One of the neatest things I learned in grad school is they actually have to worry about the tides on mountains when they&#8217;re looking at pulsars&#8230;.how your observatory moves toward and away from the pulsar as the moon goes around and around the planet Earth. They actually have to worry about that and that&#8217;s really, really cool. </p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> So hold on&#8230;they&#8217;re worrying about your motion towards and away from the pulsar?
</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> Yes, you can actually measure that as timing differences over the period of watching this pulsar over and over and over and over again. So, as you take several days worth of observations of a given pulsar, you can actually start to see variations in when the pulses arrive that are caused by your own position on the planet relative to the pulsar changing due to the tides on the earth.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Right, OK, so I&#8217;d like to sort of figure out this distinction, then. So, if I had a great big star with a lot of mass, but it wasn&#8217;t rotating&#8230; it was just kind of&#8230;somehow the angular momentum had all worked out and it just wasn&#8217;t turning very quickly. Then it blew up as a supernova and then collapsed down as a neutron star and maybe it&#8217;s turning&#8230; like a star&#8230; once every couple of days, say. We would not see that at all as a pulsar, right?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b> No. No. In fact, there are believed to be nice happy little neutron stars out there that are rotating probably several times a day that we don&#8217;t see as pulsars just because the variations aren&#8217;t such that we can see them. As the star&#8217;s rotation slows down, the amount of energy that&#8217;s getting beamed out through the magnetic field goes down.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b> Right, so it still has very powerful magnetic fields, but it&#8217;s not being bled away in the way that a pulsar is. So, then where would we kind of draw that line?  When does it turn into a pulsar?  When do we start seeing all the action? </p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  When we look out, we see pulsars going at all different speeds where they have a pulse every 1.4 milliseconds out to every 8.5 seconds.  Now, we really stop seeing them as pulsars once they get much slower than 1 rotation every 10 seconds or so, and what&#8217;s happening is each of these different types of pulsars has a slightly different energy generation mechanism.  We have the radio pulsars &#8212; these are the first ones that were discovered.  They&#8217;re powered through the rotation as they rotate around the radiating energy out of what essentially look like lighthouse beams where the magnetic fields line up with rotational axis of the star.   Then we also have the X-ray pulsars, which are really powered by the material that&#8217;s falling in onto them.  Now, with these two different types of stars, part of the reason that we&#8217;re able to identify them is that we look for these specific every-few-second rotation beats to way-less-a-second rotation beats and the type of energy that comes out is related to how fast they are rotating.  We&#8217;re also able to see the X-ray pulsars because, well, they show up on X-ray, which is always a nice, easy convenient way to find high-energy objects because the X-ray sky isn&#8217;t all that loud.  Once they start slowing down past that, they&#8217;re just not beaming the energy out as much, and so then the neutron stars…they start being identified more as just being these little, hot critters glowing faintly on the sky because they&#8217;re so tiny.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Now, you mention in sort of a throw-off comment there that they&#8217;re slowing down, that they&#8217;re giving off energy, but can you sort of describe that mechanism in more detail?  How are they losing energy?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, as they rotate, light leaving them, it&#8217;s carrying away light, energy, mass – it&#8217;s all different faces of the exact same thing.  And so, as this light gets radiated away, it&#8217;s changing the star, and the energy goes away, the angular momentum drops and you have a star that&#8217;s slowing down, and slowing down, and slowing down over time.  Now, it&#8217;s not a huge effect.  Something that is rotating once per second is, over the course of a century, going to have lost the smallest fraction of a second off it&#8217;s rotational period, so this isn&#8217;t the type of thing that we generally see very much as we watch these stars evolve through time, but they are slowing down.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So, back to our &#8220;Einsteinian&#8221; calculations:  mass and energy being equivalent, you&#8217;re saying you take the total mass of the neutron star, and then you include the energy, the rotational energy of the star, as one whole collection of mass and energy, and that defines how fast it&#8217;s going to spin.  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a real easy calculation – you just punch it all in &#8212; but that defines the speed of its rotation.  And then it is turning through radio waves, or in the case of X-rays, it&#8217;s emitting that radiation and that radiation is just pulling out of that entire equation, so it has less mass and energy and so therefore, it doesn&#8217;t have to rotate as quickly.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right, so as you change the angular momentum of the system, the rotation rate changes with it, and the best way to change something&#8217;s angular momentum is to remove some energy from the system and beaming light is a great way to remove energy.  Now, what&#8217;s cool is there&#8217;s actually been a couple of different Nobel Prizes given for discoveries in pulsars.  The first Nobel Prize went to just, well, discovering pulsars existed, and it was actually kind of controversial.  Back in 1967, Jocelyn Bell Burnell (who&#8217;s now at Oxford), and Antony Hewish discovered the very first pulsar while looking out in the radio light, and it was only Antony Hewish who received the Nobel Prize, and Jocelyn Bell Burnell was kind of left out of that particular award, but nonetheless, it was a rather dramatic discovery.  We didn&#8217;t know stars could do this.  Well then, almost a decade later, in 1974, it was another team discovery, and in both cases this was an advisor and a graduate student doing the work.  In the second case, it was Joe Taylor and Russell Hulse who were out studying pulsars and they found a pulsar in a binary system with a second neutron star, and these two stars were orbiting each other in about 8 hours.  Now, one of the things that got predicted by Einstein in general relativity was that these extremely high-mass systems should be radiating away gravitational radiation, radiating away gravitational waves, and this would cause the entire orbital system to lose energy.  Now, they were actually able to see that gravitational radiation in terms of evolution of the orbit of these two neutron stars over time, so we&#8217;ve been able to test relativity and award a number of Nobel Prizes thanks to these little tiny stars that, like you&#8217;ve pointed out, they are about the size of Manhattan.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And I think this is where some of the really useful things from pulsars come from.  As you said, they&#8217;re so precise you could just record a pulsar over the course of 100 years, it would slow down a tiny little bit, but essentially if it&#8217;s 700 a second, you&#8217;re going to get these little radio pulses from the pulsar 700 a second, and so from that you can measure things that it&#8217;s interacting with with tremendous precision [sic].</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And what&#8217;s amazing is, in some cases, we&#8217;ve been able to optically detect that these pulsations are happening.  Now, this is a lot harder – it&#8217;s not like we have lots and lots of high resolution, very sensitive cameras that are geared up to be looking for this high speed of pulsation, but the pulsar inside the Crab Nebula – we can actually see it in optical light doing its pulsar thing.  It&#8217;s one of a very small number of systems that are in a paper by Shearer and Golden.  We really only know of six of these, but yeah, they&#8217;re pulsating in optical light as well as in the radio light.  They&#8217;re amazing little systems, and they&#8217;re not extremely common, but we are finding new ways to find them thanks to using the X-ray observatories, thanks to going out and doing new radio surveys of the sky, so we&#8217;re constantly finding new ones, and we&#8217;re constantly finding new ways to use them.  Because they are so precise, we can use them to measure things that I don&#8217;t think people originally thought about &#8212; like little tiny planets.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Right, so that&#8217;s what I wanted to talk about.  What are some of the things, then, that you can use a pulsar to study?  So, you&#8217;re saying planets &#8212; we&#8217;ve talked about that a bit, that planets have been discovered &#8212; so, what&#8217;s the mechanism that they use to discover planets around a pulsar?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, with normal stars we&#8217;d look for planets either by looking for the planet to pass in front of the star and cause its light to get dimmer, which is really, really hard to do, but you can do it with a 4-inch telescope that&#8217;s really well-calibrated.  But the more common way to go out and look for planets, is to look for how the planets tug gravitationally on the star they&#8217;re orbiting.  We can measure this with the Doppler shifts of the star, where we can actually see the stars wobble about their passage through the sky as they get tugged to and fro by the planet that&#8217;s going around them.  Well, with pulsar planets, we aren&#8217;t exactly looking at the spectra, but what we can do is look at the shifting in the arrival times of the pulses that are coming toward us.  And back in 1992, Alexander Wolszczan and Dale Frail discovered the first multi-planet planetary system, and it wasn&#8217;t just the first multi-planet planetary system, it was flat-out the first planets ever discovered outside of our own solar system, and they discovered it by looking at timing issues in a pulsar that was ever-so-creatively named PSR 1257+12.  What they found was the system had very complicated…light arriving too soon, light arriving too late…and the only way to explain this dance in the pulse timings was to invoke multiple planets.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  So, with the radial velocity method of planet finding you&#8217;ve got that Doppler shift back and forth, so they were actually able to not just see the Doppler shift from one planet, but it was almost like a bit of a dance, right?  So, the timing was off a little here, a little there, a little here…and they were able to then reverse engineer how many planets, what mass they had, and what impact they were having on the rotational speed of the…or on the sort of, I guess, the radial velocity of the pulsar.  That&#8217;s crazy!</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And really it was just the tug-of-war changed, in some ways, the distance from the pulsar to the planet Earth, and with those little tiny changes in pulsar position, we saw changes in when the light arrived here.  And what was amazing about these first planets that were found is they were only a few times the size of the Earth.  The first two that were found were 4.3 and 3.9 times the size of the Earth, and we&#8217;re still struggling to find things this small using all of the other techniques that we know of.  Now, pulsar planets aren&#8217;t something we discover every day.  We&#8217;ve found 300-ish planets around other stars at this point that are nice, normal, healthy stars.  But when it comes to confirmed pulsar planets, we really only have five, and they&#8217;re going around two different pulsars, so the universe isn&#8217;t filled with pulsar planets, but what&#8217;s neat is the pulsar planets &#8212; they offer us a different way of potentially getting at planets.  One thing that&#8217;s been discovered is there&#8217;s what looks like a normal everyday proto-planetary disk around one particular pulsar:  4U 142+61.  The disk of material around this little object – it was created when the star blew itself to bits, and so it appears that stars can recycle themselves and create their own lifeless, new planetary system around the remnant star they leave behind.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Yeah, I mean, it sure wouldn&#8217;t be a wonderful place to live without a real, you know, life-giving star, but it shows that the whole process of planets coming back together again is all still…that still works, even though the star is dead.  I guess it&#8217;s still a source of gravity, and why not?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And at the end of the day it&#8217;s all about the gravity.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Yeah, and so we&#8217;ve talked about pulsars have been used as a method for working out gravitational waves and confirming relativity.  Pulsars have been used to find planets and probe planetary formation in thought-dead star systems.  So, what else are pulsars good for?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, in studying the ways that they misbehave, we can also start to understand the insides of these extremely dense objects a little better.  As we watch them over time, occasionally we see these little glitches in the timing.  So, if you watch cycle to cycle to cycle, they appear to be the most amazing atomic clocks ever, but then they sometimes hiccup &#8212; and not all of them, just some of them &#8212; and it took a while to figure out what was going on, and it seems that in some cases, over time, the insides of the star will rearrange slightly.  This is thought to maybe have something to do with the semi-conducting properties of the material inside the star changing over time.  And as the insides of the star rearrange, it&#8217;s sort of like that ice skater taking her arms and going from having them crossed one way to having them crossed another.  When you change the distribution of material, you change the moment of inertia of the star – ever so slightly &#8212; and this can create a glitch in the period of rotation, and so we can see how stars rearrange themselves by looking at how the stars&#8217; timings appear to hiccup now and then.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And I guess we would be able to see if a chunk of matter falls onto a pulsar, right?  Because it would change the overall momentum of the system…</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right, and so far we haven&#8217;t seen this in the X-ray ones that we look at.  We do see these X-ray systems where they do constantly have matter falling onto them, but so far we haven&#8217;t seen this sudden &#8220;Oh, it just ate a planet!&#8221; change in period that you might get from a sudden ingestion of one chunk of matter, rather than the slow ingestion of a continuous stream of matter.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Yeah, they&#8217;re sucking some other star through a straw.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right.  Exactly, exactly…</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  OK, so what else are they good for?</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Well, it&#8217;s just cool knowing that our universe has these high-energy lighthouses out there, and can give us this sense of, well, what is the frequency at which you end up with these high energy binary systems in different places.  So, as we look out at globular clusters, and we see these X-ray pulsars, theses recycled systems, where the pulsar is getting sped up from eating material off of a companion, either just through sucking it straight out, &#8220;sucking it through a straw,&#8221; as you put it, or by ingesting the stellar winds.  We can look at these systems and say, &#8220;OK, this is the frequency at which binaries either get born, get created by one star grabbing the other.&#8221;  It&#8217;s neat to be able to understand how stars exist, and neutron stars, they aren&#8217;t exactly giving off a lot of light, but pulsars, because they&#8217;re so weird, allow us to pinpoint them in distant globular clusters and understand the properties of stellar populations in these distant systems.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  And I think we talked a couple of episodes ago that one of the fastest, or the fastest star in our galaxy is a pulsar.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Right, it&#8217;s a neutron star that got ejected during an asymmetric supernova explosion.  And we can&#8217;t fully explain how that happens, but if you explode something in just the right crazy sort of way, you can end up sending a neutron star not just flying through the galaxy, but flying out of the galaxy.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Right, the supernova went off more like a rocket than an explosion that blew it out of nowhere.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  Yes.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Well, that is really cool!  Now, are there any…what would you say are like the big outstanding mysteries about pulsars?  I guess you hinted a bit as to what is the actual configuration of their structure.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And we know neutron stars are just part of a phase of evolution that have these regular pulsars that are rotationally-driven, that have these X-ray pulsars that come from ingesting matter, and then there&#8217;s this other mysterious critter known as a &#8220;magnitar,&#8221; which is an extremely magnetic object, that isn&#8217;t pulsating, but periodically gives off bursts of X-ray and gamma ray light.  And trying to put all these pieces together of how neutron stars, which, on one hand are extremely simplistic objects…they are just giant balls of neutrons.  Well, how is it that these simplistic objects have such powerful magnetic fields?  How is it that they transition and can be all three of these different faces?  And, can one object pass through all three of these different stages?  We&#8217;re still figuring out how to put all these other pieces together.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Right.  So, is it almost like human life, right?  You start out as a baby, then you&#8217;re a teenager, then you&#8217;re middle-aged, and so does this class of object, I mean they&#8217;re all just a ball of neutrons, but do they all start out as pulsars, and then turn into magnitars, and then spend the rest of their lives as neutron stars?  Is there some different combination, or are they just, depending on the rotation of the star beforehand, or how the mass of it was, or what its magnetic field was?  Does that define what kind of an object, or how it behaves?  Even though at the end of the day it&#8217;s just a ball of neutrons.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  And trying to understand is complicated by the fact that these are faint, that none of them are nearby.  And it&#8217;s also made more interesting because they&#8217;re some of the most dangerous objects in the galaxy.  One of these that went off in 2004 – a magnitar on the other side of the center of the galaxy from us – was able to temporarily blind some of the satellites orbiting the earth by blasting their cameras with so much energy that they had to be basically turned off and on a few different times to clear out all the extra light.  So, they&#8217;re interesting; they&#8217;re fascinating.  They look like they should be simple, but they&#8217;re not.  And they do so many different interesting things that we can apply in so many different ways &#8212; from finding planets to better understanding the behavior of our own planet &#8212; that they&#8217;re definitely worth studying.</p>
<p><b>Fraser:</b>  Cool!  Alright, well, thanks Pamela.</p>
<p><b>Pamela:</b>  It&#8217;s been my pleasure, Fraser.  I&#8217;ll talk to you next week.</p>
<p>
</p>
</div>
<p><small>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file. It has been edited for clarity.<br />
</small></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/11/ep-158-pulsars/' addthis:title='Ep. 158: Pulsars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/11/ep-158-pulsars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-091005.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Imagine an object with the mass of the Sun, crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now set that object spinning hundreds of times a second, blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#039;s a pulsar,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Imagine an object with the mass of the Sun, crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now set that object spinning hundreds of times a second, blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#039;s a pulsar, one of the most exotic objects in the Universe.



Ep. 158: Pulsars
Jump to Shownotes
Jump to Transcript 





Shownotes


	Pulsar Tutorial -- Science@NASA
	Pulsars -- Goddard SFC
	Pulsars -- UTK
	Neutron Stars VS. Pulsars 
	Conservation of Angular Momentum -- UTK
	Fast spinning pulsars (millisecond pulsars) --NRAO
	1974 Nobel Prize in Physics to Antony Hewish for the discovery of pulsars
	Jocelyn Bell Burnell -- UCLA
	1993 Nobel Prize in Physics to Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor for discovery of binary pulsars
	Gravitational Radiation -- DrPhysics
	Crab Nebula Pulsar -- SolStation
	Paper:  Why Study Pulsars Optically; A. Shearer &amp; A. Golden
	Planet Hunting -- How Stuff Works
	Discovery of PSR1257+12 by Alexander Wolszczam and Dale Frail -- Internet Ency. of Science
	Pulsar Planet Star System -- Extrasolar Vision
	Pulsar 4U 0142+61 with protoplanetary disk -- Spitzer
	Fastest Spinning Pulsar IGR J00291+5934 -- Universe Today
	Magnetar -- Wiki
	Magnetar that &quot;blinded&quot; satellites in 2004 -- Space.com





Transcript: PulsarsDownload the transcript

Fraser: Astronomy Cast Episode 158 for Monday October 5, 2009:  Pulsars. Welcome to Astronomy Cast, our weekly facts-based journey through the Cosmos, where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know. My name is Fraser Cain, I&#039;m the publisher of Universe Today, and with me is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Hey, Pamela.

Pamela: Hey Fraser, how&#039;s it going?
Fraser: Good. Pulsars! So, imagine an object with the mass of the sun crushed down to the size of Manhattan. Now, set that object spinning...hundreds of times per second... blasting out powerful beams of radiation like a lighthouse. That&#039;s a pulsar...one of the most exotic objects in the universe. Alright, Pamela, so maybe you can give another equally gripping description of what a pulsar is.  If we could see a pulsar, what would we see? 

Pamela: The coolest thing about this is if you took a thimbleful of the surface and looked at just that one thimbleful of the surface, it would weigh a hundred million tons, and it would be going around and around something the circumference of Manhattan roughly... something about 12 miles in diameter...as fast as 1000 times per second. It&#039;s kind of extreme!

Fraser: Yeah...yeah. Well, then I think we need to go back first and hear the story...just where do these things come from?
Pamela: Well, when a mommy and daddy star get together...

Fraser: So, where do we get a pulsar from?

Pamela: There&#039;s actually 2 different general species of pulsars. In one case, you take a big ol&#039; star and you let it die violently as a supernova. In some cases you end up left behind this core of the star that contains all of its angular momentum. You take all of that rotational energy, keep it...at least keep most of it...and set it loose rotating something that&#039;s way smaller. So this is the equivalent of taking your ice skater who has her arms spread out straight and not only having her wrap her arms around her body, but have her body suddenly become smaller than a piece of spaghetti around. So not only does the speed increase a little, it increases a whole lot with that conservation of angular momentum. 

Fraser: So a pulsar was once a star, it detonated as a supernova, and you&#039;re just left with some super-dense core that remains, but it still has all of the spinning that it had when it was a big star. 

Pamela: In the case of pulsars, they also have a magnetic field. Magnetic fields are one of those things that when you try to explain them, people get confused and it&#039;s hard. But they have these really powerful magnetic fields that aren&#039;t fully understood,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 156: Famous Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-156-famous-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-156-famous-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we&#8217;re going to talk about famous stars. But not those boring human ones you read about in People magazine. No, we&#8217;re talking about those hot balls of plasma across the distant Universe. The close ones, the bright ones, the massive ones, the giant ones. Let&#8217;s get to know some famous stars. Ep. 156: [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-156-famous-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 156: Famous Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_987" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-987" title="VY Canis Majoris" src="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/600px-VY_Canis_Majoris-150x150.jpg" alt="VY Canis Majoris" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">VY Canis Majoris</p></div>
<p>This week we&#8217;re going to talk about famous stars. But not those boring human ones you read about in People magazine. No, we&#8217;re talking about those hot balls of plasma across the distant Universe. The close ones, the bright ones, the massive ones, the giant ones. Let&#8217;s get to know some famous stars.</p>
<p><span id="more-986"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090921.mp3">Ep. 156: Famous Stars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/Polaris.html">MOST FAMOUS: Polaris</a> &#8212; UIUC</li>
<li><a href="http://istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Spolaris.htm">How to find Polaris</a> &#8212; GSFC</li>
<li><a href="http://astronomyspace.suite101.com/article.cfm/constant_as_the_northern_star">Misconceptions about the North Star </a>(&#8220;Constant as the North Star&#8221; &#8212; Shakespeare)</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/mysteries_l1/cepheid.html">Cepheid Variable stars </a></li>
<li><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080617.html">MOST POWERFUL:  Eta Carinae</a> &#8212; APOD</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernova">Hypernova</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius">BRIGHTEST (But not most luminous): Sirius</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_star">Binary Stars </a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VY_Canis_Majoris">BIGGEST: VY Canis Majoris</a></li>
<li><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/astro/redsup.html">Red Supergiants</a> &#8212; GSU</li>
<li><a href="http://www.giantstars.de/">Video:  Biggest Stars in the Universe</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/what-is-the-smallest-star/">SMALLEST:  Ogle TR-122b</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/red-dwarf-stars/">Red Dwarf Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf">SMALLEST STAR THAT IS NOT A RED DWARF:  White Dwarf Stars </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.aao.gov.au/images/captions/uks038.html">CLOSEST:  Proxima Centauri </a>&#8211; AAO</li>
<li><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960526.html">Alpha Centauri System</a> &#8212; APOD</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse">MOST LIKELY TO EXPLODE: </a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse">Betelgeuse</a> and Eta Carinae</li>
<li><a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2003/11/">Helix Nebula </a>&#8211; HubbleSite</li>
<li><a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1996/22">Crab Nebula</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/14/2012-combat-the-nonsense/">2012 Stupidity</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/puppis/">FASTEST MOVING: RX J0822-4300</a> &#8212; Chandra</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/pulsars.html">Neutron Stars </a></li>
<li><a href="http://zebu.uoregon.edu/51peg.html">FIRST STAR FOUND TO HAVE A PLANET:  51 Pegasus</a></li>
<li><a href="http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/">Extra Solar Planets</a> &#8212; Planet Quest</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1257%2B12">FIRST STAR TO FOUND TO HAVE PLANETARY SYSTEM: PSR B1257+12</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar">Pulsar</a></li>
<li>OTHER FAMOUS STARS FROM SCIENCE FICTION:</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_359">Wolf 359</a></li>
<li><a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Battle_of_Wolf_359">The Battle of Wolf 359 on Star Trek</a> (Resistance is futile; You will be assimilated)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.solstation.com/stars/eps-erid.htm">Epsilon Eridani </a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_(Star_Trek)">a.k.a. Vulcan</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mcdonaldobservatory.org/">McDonald Observatory</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="transcript">
<h3><a name="transcript">Transcript</a></h3>
<p>Coming Soon!
</p></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-156-famous-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 156: Famous Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-156-famous-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090921.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>This week we&#039;re going to talk about famous stars. But not those boring human ones you read about in People magazine. No, we&#039;re talking about those hot balls of plasma across the distant Universe. The close ones, the bright ones, the massive ones,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This week we&#039;re going to talk about famous stars. But not those boring human ones you read about in People magazine. No, we&#039;re talking about those hot balls of plasma across the distant Universe. The close ones, the bright ones, the massive ones, the giant ones. Let&#039;s get to know some famous stars.





Ep. 156: Famous Stars
Jump to Shownotes
Jump to Transcript or Download (coming soon!)





Shownotes

	MOST FAMOUS: Polaris -- UIUC
	How to find Polaris -- GSFC
	Misconceptions about the North Star (&quot;Constant as the North Star&quot; -- Shakespeare)
	Cepheid Variable stars 
	MOST POWERFUL:  Eta Carinae -- APOD
	Hypernova -- Wiki
	BRIGHTEST (But not most luminous): Sirius
	Binary Stars 
	BIGGEST: VY Canis Majoris
	Red Supergiants -- GSU
	Video:  Biggest Stars in the Universe
	SMALLEST:  Ogle TR-122b -- Universe Today
	Red Dwarf Stars
	SMALLEST STAR THAT IS NOT A RED DWARF:  White Dwarf Stars 
	CLOSEST:  Proxima Centauri -- AAO
	Alpha Centauri System -- APOD
	MOST LIKELY TO EXPLODE: Betelgeuse and Eta Carinae
	Helix Nebula -- HubbleSite
	Crab Nebula
	2012 Stupidity -- Universe Today
	FASTEST MOVING: RX J0822-4300 -- Chandra
	Neutron Stars 
	FIRST STAR FOUND TO HAVE A PLANET:  51 Pegasus
	Extra Solar Planets -- Planet Quest
	FIRST STAR TO FOUND TO HAVE PLANETARY SYSTEM: PSR B1257+12
	Pulsar
	OTHER FAMOUS STARS FROM SCIENCE FICTION:
	Wolf 359
	The Battle of Wolf 359 on Star Trek (Resistance is futile; You will be assimilated)
	Epsilon Eridani 
	a.k.a. Vulcan
	McDonald Observatory



 Transcript
Coming Soon!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 155: Dwarf Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-155-dwarf-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-155-dwarf-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We think we live near an average star, but that&#8217;s not the case at all. Compared to most stars in the Universe, the Sun is a giant! Let&#8217;s look at the small end of the stellar spectrum, to stars with a fraction of the size and mass of our own Sun. There are many ways [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-155-dwarf-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 155: Dwarf Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_982" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-982" title="Artist illustration of a red dwarf star." src="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/reddwarf-150x150.jpg" alt="Artist illustration of a red dwarf star." width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Artist illustration of a red dwarf star.</p></div>
<p>We think we live near an average star, but that&#8217;s not the case at all. Compared to most stars in the Universe, the Sun is a giant! Let&#8217;s look at the small end of the stellar spectrum, to stars with a fraction of the size and mass of our own Sun. There are many ways that a star can get small, and they lead dramatically different lives and deaths.</p>
<p><span id="more-981"></span></p>
<table style="height: 53px;" width="574">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090914.mp3">Ep. 155: Dwarf Stars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or <a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-100208_transcript.pdf">Download</a></li>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ul>
<table style="height: 78px;" width="381">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</ul>
<p></p>
<div id="shownotes">
<a name="shownotes"><br />
<h3>Show Notes</h3>
<p></a></p>
<ul />
<ul>
<li>How big (or little) is our Sun?  Sun&#8217;s Mass: 1.9891 ×1030 KG</li>
<li>A red dwarf is a small, cool, very faint, main sequence star whose surface  temperature is under about 4,000 K. Red dwarfs are the most common type of star.  Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf. (via<a href="http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/stars/startypes.shtml"> Enchanted Learning</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/red-dwarf-stars/">Red Dwarf Stars -</a>- Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf">Red Dwarf Stars</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/how-long-do-stars-last/">How long do stars last?</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.as.utexas.edu/astronomy/education/spring02/scalo/heath.pdf">Paper:  Habitability of Planets Around Red Dwarf Stars </a>&#8211; University of Texas</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_581">Gliese 581</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201/hydrogen_burn.htm">Hydrogen Burning</a> &#8212; Cornell</li>
<li><a href="http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/cosmic_reference/brown_dwarfs.html">Brown Dwarf Stars </a>&#8211; Cool Cosmos</li>
<li><a href="http://astro.berkeley.edu/~stars/bdwarfs/">Research on Brown Dwarfs</a> &#8212; UC Berkeley</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/red-dwarf-stars/">Red Dwarf Stars </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf">Red Dwarfs</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectronDegeneracyPressure.html">Electron Degeneracy Pressure</a> &#8212; Wolfram</li>
<li><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/astro/whdwar.html">White Dwarf -</a>- GSU</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l2/dwarfs.html">White Dwarf </a>&#8211; Goddard SFC</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.ubc.ca/people/scott/cmb_intro.html">Background radiation of the Universe</a> (CMB) &#8212; UBC</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/black-dwarf/">Black dwarf stars </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_dwarf">Black dwarfs </a>&#8211; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/971002b.html">How are black dwarf stars and neutron stars similar? </a> Goddard SFC</li>
<li><a href="http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/bluestrag.htm">Blue stragglers in globular clusters</a> &#8212; SolStation</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.professorastronomy.com/2009/09/looking-for-planets-around-white-dwarfs.html">Looking for Planets Around White Dwarf Stars -</a>- Professor Astronomy</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-86-the-end-of-the-universe-part-1-the-end-of-the-solar-system/">Ep. 86  End of Everything Pt. 1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/cosmology/ep-87-the-end-of-the-universe-part-2-the-end-of-everything/">Ep. 87 End of Everything Pt. 2</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-155-dwarf-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 155: Dwarf Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/10/ep-155-dwarf-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090914.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>We think we live near an average star, but that&#039;s not the case at all. Compared to most stars in the Universe, the Sun is a giant! Let&#039;s look at the small end of the stellar spectrum, to stars with a fraction of the size and mass of our own Sun.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>We think we live near an average star, but that&#039;s not the case at all. Compared to most stars in the Universe, the Sun is a giant! Let&#039;s look at the small end of the stellar spectrum, to stars with a fraction of the size and mass of our own Sun. There are many ways that a star can get small, and they lead dramatically different lives and deaths.







	Ep. 155: Dwarf Stars
	Jump to Shownotes
	Jump to Transcript or Download













Show Notes


	How big (or little) is our Sun?  Sun&#039;s Mass: 1.9891 ×1030 KG
	A red dwarf is a small, cool, very faint, main sequence star whose surface  temperature is under about 4,000 K. Red dwarfs are the most common type of star.  Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf. (via Enchanted Learning)


	Red Dwarf Stars -- Universe Today
	Red Dwarf Stars -- Wiki
	How long do stars last? -- Universe Today
	Paper:  Habitability of Planets Around Red Dwarf Stars -- University of Texas
	Gliese 581 -- Wiki
	Hydrogen Burning -- Cornell
	Brown Dwarf Stars -- Cool Cosmos
	Research on Brown Dwarfs -- UC Berkeley
	Red Dwarf Stars -- Universe Today
	Red Dwarfs -- Wiki
	Electron Degeneracy Pressure -- Wolfram
	White Dwarf -- GSU
	White Dwarf -- Goddard SFC
	Background radiation of the Universe (CMB) -- UBC
	Black dwarf stars -- Universe Today
	Black dwarfs -- Wiki
	How are black dwarf stars and neutron stars similar?  Goddard SFC
	Blue stragglers in globular clusters -- SolStation
	Looking for Planets Around White Dwarf Stars -- Professor Astronomy
	Ep. 86  End of Everything Pt. 1
	Ep. 87 End of Everything Pt. 2</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 152: Binary Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/09/ep-152-binary-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/09/ep-152-binary-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that our Solar System is a rarity with its single star. Astronomers believe that most star systems out there actually contain 2 or more stars &#8211; imagine seeing a sky with 4 suns. These binary and multiple star systems are a great target for new astronomers, and the dynamics of multiple stars [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/09/ep-152-binary-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 152: Binary Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_959" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-959" title="Artist's illustration of a cataclysmic variable" src="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Accretion_Disk_Binary_System-150x150.jpg" alt="Artist's illustration of a cataclysmic variable" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Artist&#39;s illustration of a cataclysmic variable</p></div>
<p>Did you know that our Solar System is a rarity with its single star. Astronomers believe that most star systems out there actually contain 2 or more stars &#8211; imagine seeing a sky with 4 suns. These binary and multiple star systems are a great target for new astronomers, and the dynamics of multiple stars keep astrophysicists busy too. Let&#8217;s take a look at what it would be like to live on Tatooine.</p>
<p><span id="more-958"></span></p>
<table style="height: 53px;" width="574">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090824.mp3">Ep. 152: Binary Stars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or <a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-100208_transcript.pdf">Download</a></li>
<div id="shownotes">
<a name="shownotes"><br />
<h3>Show Notes</h3>
<p></a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tatooine">Tatooine </a>&#8211; Wookipedia</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/what-is-a-binary-star/">Binary Stars</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_X-1">Cygnus binary system</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/1340/stars-merge-new-cosmic-explosion">Binary stars that merge</a> &#8212; COSMOS</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/binaries/algol.html">Algol, the most famous eclipsing binary system</a> &#8212; UTK</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/binaries/visual.html">Visual Binary Stars </a>&#8211; UTK</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astropix.com/HTML/C_SPRING/BIGDIP.HTM">Mizar in the Big Dipper</a> &#8212; Astropix</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrometry">Astrometry </a></li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/binaries/spectroscopic.html">Spectroscopic Binary Stars</a> &#8212; UTK</li>
<li><a href="http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=297">Blue Stragglers</a> &#8212; Cornell U.</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/001106a.html">Accretion Disks</a> &#8212; NASA</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l2/dwarfs.html">White Dwarf</a>s</li>
<li><a href="http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/lectures/node65.html">Electron Degenerate gas</a> &#8212; University of Texas</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle">Pauli Exclusion Principle </a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri">Alpha Centauri System</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/09/ep-152-binary-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 152: Binary Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2009/09/ep-152-binary-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-090824.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Did you know that our Solar System is a rarity with its single star. Astronomers believe that most star systems out there actually contain 2 or more stars - imagine seeing a sky with 4 suns. These binary and multiple star systems are a great target for...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Did you know that our Solar System is a rarity with its single star. Astronomers believe that most star systems out there actually contain 2 or more stars - imagine seeing a sky with 4 suns. These binary and multiple star systems are a great target for new astronomers, and the dynamics of multiple stars keep astrophysicists busy too. Let&#039;s take a look at what it would be like to live on Tatooine.






	Ep. 152: Binary Stars
	Jump to Shownotes
	Jump to Transcript or Download

Show Notes

	Tatooine -- Wookipedia
	Binary Stars -- Universe Today
	Cygnus binary system
	Binary stars that merge -- COSMOS
	Algol, the most famous eclipsing binary system -- UTK
	Visual Binary Stars -- UTK
	Mizar in the Big Dipper -- Astropix
	Astrometry 
	Spectroscopic Binary Stars -- UTK
	Blue Stragglers -- Cornell U.
	Accretion Disks -- NASA
	White Dwarfs
	Electron Degenerate gas -- University of Texas
	Pauli Exclusion Principle 
	Alpha Centauri System</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions Show: Distance in Space, Changing Earth&#8217;s Orbit, and Different Sized Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/12/questions-show-distance-in-space-changing-earths-orbit-and-different-sized-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/12/questions-show-distance-in-space-changing-earths-orbit-and-different-sized-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questions Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we find out the distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex, how astronomers measure distance between objects, the possibility that an object could mess up the orbit of Earth, and the reason for different sizes of stars. If you&#8217;ve got a question for the Astronomy Cast team, please email it in to info@astronomycast.com and we&#8217;ll [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/12/questions-show-distance-in-space-changing-earths-orbit-and-different-sized-stars/' addthis:title='Questions Show: Distance in Space, Changing Earth&#8217;s Orbit, and Different Sized Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_453" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/betelgeuse_hst.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-453" title="Betelgeuse. Image credit: Hubble" src="http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/betelgeuse_hst-150x150.jpg" alt="Betelgeuse. Image credit: Hubble" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Betelgeuse. Image credit: Hubble</p></div>
<p>This week we find out the distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex, how astronomers measure distance between objects, the possibility that an object could mess up the orbit of Earth, and the reason for different sizes of stars. If you&#8217;ve got a question for the Astronomy Cast team, please email it in to info@astronomycast.com and we&#8217;ll try to tackle it for a future show. Please include your location and a way to pronounce your name.</p>
<p>><br />
<span id="more-452"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-081211.mp3">Distance in Space, Changing Earth&#8217;s Orbit, and Different Sized Stars</a></strong>
</li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<p><strong>Distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/betelgeuse.html">Betelgeuse is 640 lightyears from Earth</a> (see bottom of linked article to see updated distance)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/bellatrix.html">Bellatrex is 240 lightyears from Earth</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/star_intro.html#brightness">Parallax: brightness and distance </a>&#8211; UIUC</li>
<li><a href="http://brahms.phy.vanderbilt.edu/a103/info/angdist.shtml">Measuring angular distances</a> &#8212; Vanderbilt U</li>
<li><a href="http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=261">How Can We Measure Distances to Stars?</a> &#8212; Cornell U</li>
<li><a href="http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=HIPPARCOS">Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/21/the-bow-shock-of-betelgeuse-revealed/">Recent article on Belegeuse&#8217;s bow shock</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/astronomy/episode-22-variable-stars/">AC Episode 22:  Variable Stars</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Could an object coming through our solar system change Earth&#8217;s orbit?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-86756.html">Discussion of changing Earth&#8217;s orbit </a>&#8211; Physics Forums</li>
<li><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14983">Moving the Earth: A Planetary Survival Guide </a>&#8211; New Scientist</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/19/2012-planet-x-is-not-nibiru/">Planet X is Not Nibiru </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/25/2012-no-planet-x/">No Planet X </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why are there different sizes of stars?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/educators/podcast/transcripts/070205_star_sizes.shtml">Dr. Marc Rayman of JPL answers the question on The Space Place (transcript)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://odeo.com/episodes/22116753-Why-are-stars-different-sizes">Space Place podcast of Rayman&#8217;s answer</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What are Pamela and Fraser most excited about in outstanding questions in astronomy?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Pamela:  <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/mysteries_l1/dark_energy.html">Dark Energy</a>, <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/dark_matter.html">Dark Matter</a></li>
<li>Fraser:  <a href="http://www.exploratorium.edu/origins/cern/ideas/higgs.html">Higgs Boson</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Is is possible there isn&#8217;t dark energy?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://nasascience.nasa.gov/astrophysics/what-is-dark-energy">What is dark energy? </a>&#8211; NASA</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/12/16/no-big-rip-in-our-future-chandra-provides-insights-into-dark-energy/">Chandra observations confirm dark energy </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/astro/universe/universe.asp">The Expanding Universe</a> &#8212; SDSS</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What are the surface of gas planets like? </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/phonedrmarc/2003_september.shtml">If Saturn and Jupiter are gas giants, could you fly through them? </a>&#8211; NASA&#8217;s Space Place</li>
<li><a href="http://ircamera.as.arizona.edu/astr_250/Lectures/Lecture_07.htm">Gas Giants</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>How did Astronomy Cast get started?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.slackerastronomy.org/wordpress/">Slacker Astronomy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slackerastronomy.org/wordpress/2005/06/council-of-doom-1-its-alive/">Slacker Astronomy Council of Doom</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/">Phil Plait</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/about/">About Us link </a>(or see above)</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/12/questions-show-distance-in-space-changing-earths-orbit-and-different-sized-stars/' addthis:title='Questions Show: Distance in Space, Changing Earth&#8217;s Orbit, and Different Sized Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/12/questions-show-distance-in-space-changing-earths-orbit-and-different-sized-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-081211.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>This week we find out the distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex, how astronomers measure distance between objects, the possibility that an object could mess up the orbit of Earth, and the reason for different sizes of stars.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This week we find out the distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex, how astronomers measure distance between objects, the possibility that an object could mess up the orbit of Earth, and the reason for different sizes of stars. If you&#039;ve got a question for the Astronomy Cast team, please email it in to info@astronomycast.com and we&#039;ll try to tackle it for a future show. Please include your location and a way to pronounce your name.

&gt;


Distance in Space, Changing Earth&#039;s Orbit, and Different Sized Stars
Jump to Transcript or Download (coming soon!)





Shownotes

Distance between Betelgeuse and Bellatrex

	Betelgeuse is 640 lightyears from Earth (see bottom of linked article to see updated distance)
	Bellatrex is 240 lightyears from Earth
	Parallax: brightness and distance -- UIUC
	Measuring angular distances -- Vanderbilt U
	How Can We Measure Distances to Stars? -- Cornell U
	Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission
	Recent article on Belegeuse&#039;s bow shock -- Universe Today
	AC Episode 22:  Variable Stars

Could an object coming through our solar system change Earth&#039;s orbit?

	Discussion of changing Earth&#039;s orbit -- Physics Forums
	Moving the Earth: A Planetary Survival Guide -- New Scientist
	Planet X is Not Nibiru -- Universe Today
	No Planet X -- Universe Today

Why are there different sizes of stars?

	Dr. Marc Rayman of JPL answers the question on The Space Place (transcript)
	Space Place podcast of Rayman&#039;s answer

What are Pamela and Fraser most excited about in outstanding questions in astronomy?

	Pamela:  Dark Energy, Dark Matter
	Fraser:  Higgs Boson

Is is possible there isn&#039;t dark energy?

	What is dark energy? -- NASA
	Chandra observations confirm dark energy -- Universe Today
	The Expanding Universe -- SDSS

What are the surface of gas planets like? 

	If Saturn and Jupiter are gas giants, could you fly through them? -- NASA&#039;s Space Place
	Gas Giants

How did Astronomy Cast get started?

	Slacker Astronomy
	Slacker Astronomy Council of Doom
	Phil Plait
	About Us link (or see above)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 109: The Life of Other Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/10/ep-109-the-life-of-other-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/10/ep-109-the-life-of-other-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stellar Evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we looked at the complete life of the Sun, birth to death. But stars can be smaller, and stars can get much much larger. And with a change in mass, their lives change too. Let&#8217;s start the clock again, and see what happens to the smallest stars in the Universe; and what happens [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/10/ep-109-the-life-of-other-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 109: The Life of Other Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week we looked at the complete life of the Sun, birth to death. But stars can be smaller, and stars can get much much larger. And with a change in mass, their lives change too. Let&#8217;s start the clock again, and see what happens to the smallest stars in the Universe; and what happens to the largest.</p>
<p><span id="more-388"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-081006.mp3">Ep. 109: The Life of Other Stars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.seasky.org/cosmic/sky7a01.html#Top">Life cycles of different stars</a> &#8212; from Sea and Sky</li>
<li><a href="http://solar-heliospheric.engin.umich.edu/hjenning/RadiativeZone.html">Radiative Zone-</a> from U of Michigan</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/RadiativeTransport.html">Radiative Transport </a>&#8211; from the Astrophysics Spectator</li>
<li>and <a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/ConvectiveTransport.html">Convective Transport &#8211;</a>from A. S.</li>
<li><a href="http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast121/lectures/lec22.html">Convective Transport</a> &#8212; from University of Oregon</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/dwarfs.html">White Dwarf stars</a> &#8212; from Imagine the Universe</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/12/05/white-dwarfs-rocket-away-when-theyre-born/">White Dwarfs Rocket Away When They Are Born </a>&#8211; from Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://astro.berkeley.edu/~basri/bdwarfs/index.html">Browns Dwarfs</a> &#8212; from Berkeley</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/10/06/astronomers-find-a-planet-denser-than-lead/">Brown Dwarf or Big Jupiter? </a> from Bad Astronomy</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomynotes.com/evolutn/s10.htm">Degenerate gases</a> &#8212; from Bakersfield College</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/990409a.html">Helium Flash</a> &#8212; Imagine the Universe</li>
<li><a href="http://physics.gmu.edu/~jevans/astr103/CourseNotes/Text/Lec05/Lec05_pt5_txt_stellarPostMSEvol.htm">Post Main Sequence Evolution</a> &#8212; from George Mason University</li>
<li><a href="http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/stellarevolution_postmain.html">Post Sequence Stars</a> (neon, magnesium, oxygen and silicon burning) &#8211;from Australian Telescope Outreach</li>
<li><a href="http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~pberlind/atlas/htmls/wrstars.html">Wolf Rayet Stars</a> &#8212; from Harvard</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/CollapseCompactStars.html">Instability of Compact Stars </a>&#8211; from Astrophysics Spectator</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/BinaryStarMasses.html">Binary Stars and Stellar Mass </a>&#8211; from A.S.</li>
<li><a href="http://seds.org/messier//bina.html">Binary and Multiple Star Systems</a> &#8212; from SEDS</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/16/colliding-white-dwarfs-could-create-a-supergiant-star/">Colliding White Dwarfs Could Create a Supergiant Star </a>&#8211; from Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/ppchain.html">Proton Proton Chains</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nrumiano.free.fr/Estars/energy.html">Beyond helium burning</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Papers:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0404291">Helium White Dwarf of Extremely Low Mass</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/mnr/2004/00000352/00000001/art00023">Formation of a Helium White Dwarf in Close Binary System</a></li>
<li><a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...193..169A">Advanced Evolution of Massive Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4789">Mass Loss and Evolution of Hot Massive Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118945198/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;SRETRY=0">Merged Binary White Dwarf Stars</a></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<h3>TRANSCRIPT:The Life of Other Stars</h3>
<p> <strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-081006_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Fraser Cain:</strong> Last week we looked at the complete life of the Sun from birth to death.  But, stars could be smaller and stars can get much larger.  With the change in mass their lives change too.  So, let&#8217;s start the clock again and let&#8217;s see what happens to the smallest stars in the universe and what happens to the largest.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the smallest.  I guess we&#8217;re going to set the Sun as our baseline. Just as a quick refresher from last week. A cloud of gas comes together star settles down, fusion ignites; you get a main sequence star. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The star runs out of fusion, kicks into Helium, runs out of Helium.  It turns into a red dwarf, foists out its outer layer turns into a white dwarf and then eventually cools down to a black dwarf.  Did I miss anything?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Dr. Pamela Gay:</strong> No, I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay, so then let&#8217;s get smaller. [Laughter]</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> To get a significantly different life cycle for a star, you have to get way smaller.  You actually have to get down to about a quarter of the size of the Sun.  Once you get that small you actually get some really different physics.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are a couple of different ways that energy can get transported through a star.  One is you just send photons out.  In this case you get what we call radiative transfer.  The energy is transferred by a particle of light going from one atom to another in a kind of random walk through the star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Another way of transporting energy is through convection.  This is basically how a lava lamp works.  You get a pocket of really hot material; the hot stuff is a little bit dense. It rises and as it rises it gives off its heat.  As it gives off its heat it gets denser and eventually it sinks again.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So which one is our Sun doing?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It&#8217;s doing both.  But down in its core which is where it matters, it has radiative transport.  So you have a core of hot nuclear reactions producing lots and lots of light.  Light is radiating out going through a radiative zone where it&#8217;s the light that&#8217;s transporting the energy and then partway up there is a transition point.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>At this transition point we switch to having a convective Sun where you start getting bulk transport of materials, bulk heat exchange and it&#8217;s probably somewhere in-between those two layers that the magnetic field of the Sun is generated.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  If I understand correctly, that&#8217;s kind of why the Sun &#8211; if you look at it with a good telescope with a good filter &#8211; the Sun has that mottled appearance.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like there are granules on the surface because it has bubbles of hot gas that are coming from down below popping off on the surface and then sinking back down.  You get almost like boiling water.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> That mixing allows the outer layers of the star to be constantly mixing up the materials.  Down in the center of the Sun, you&#8217;re sorta stuck with things where they are.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>You have light going through the material transporting heat through the material, but the material itself is pretty much staying put.  So, you don&#8217;t end up with any mixing of the Helium down in the center of the Sun with outer layers of the star.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> Right and that&#8217;s the problem is that the Sun is running out of Hydrogen because it&#8217;s not getting mixed up.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> If we could come up with some magical way to change where in the Sun the different energy transport mechanisms take place, we might be able to prolong the main sequence lifetime of our Sun.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  What about like a BIG stirring spoon?  Come up and just give it a stir every now and then. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> [Laughter] Now unfortunately, the nature of the way the Sun is built doesn&#8217;t allow that.  But, if you take a star that is about a fourth the size of our Sun. Zero point 26 times the size of our Sun, in that case you can still end up with the Hydrogen burning in the core.  That&#8217;s the hottest, densest part of the star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>But in this case the lighter weight star is able to constantly convect the entire star convecting. So as you have these nuclear reactions going on in the very heart of the Star, the material in these nuclear reactions are producing, it is constantly getting mixed throughout the entire star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re constantly bringing new material into the center, taking the Helium that you&#8217;re producing, mixing it outward and so you&#8217;re constantly able to regenerate the source of fuel in the center of this little tiny star.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Oh, so these little stars have no radiative zone, they only have a convective zone that goes all the way down to the core.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela: </strong>So when these stars run out of fuel, they really run out of fuel.  There is like no other alternative.  It also means that they only go through one phase of life.  They simply sit there and go: Hydrogen burn, Hydrogen burn for billions upon billions of years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Like how many billions?  You said billions a lot.  How many billions?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Billions in this case translates out to a hundred billion years.  Our universe has only been around for 13.7 plus or minus 2 billion years.  These stars are essentially still toddlers.  They have a long ways to go before they finally run out of fuel.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  While a star like our Sun only lasts 10 million, these ones are going to last a hundred billion because they&#8217;re getting constantly mixed up.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And they&#8217;re also burning through their fuel a lot slower.  They&#8217;re smaller stars. The reaction rates go on at a much slower rate so they&#8217;re effectively going to run through &#8211; at the end of the day &#8211; a lot less fuel. But they&#8217;re going to do it at a slower rate.  These are essentially the &#8220;economy cars&#8221; of the universe.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right but they&#8217;re going to be very efficient.  So let&#8217;s say that a hundred billion years down the road they&#8217;ve been in their main sequence stage and then they&#8217;ve run out of Hydrogen &#8211; I guess they&#8217;re what solid Helium at this point?  What happens then?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Pretty much solid Helium and they just cool off.  The thing is as they just cool off they calmly transition into being little white dwarf stars.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The end point for these stars is the same as the Sun but they go through a whole lot less drama getting there.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Do they turn into red giants?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No, they just sort of run out of fuel one day and contract.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Then it would be like a white dwarf.  But unlike a white dwarf like our Sun which would be made of Carbon; these would just be made of Helium at this point? </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah, so we&#8217;re going to end up with Helium white dwarfs out of this.  There is no planetary nebula; no exciting red giant phase, no Helium flash, just calmly, sedately for a hundred billion years burning Hydrogen to Helium.  And then it contracts down into a white dwarf.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Nobody has ever seen one because none have ever been born.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Nope, but this is why we have mathematical models and computers.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now, does anything interesting happen when you get even smaller than that?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> If you get too small you actually end up with &#8211; what we argue about if something is really a star or not &#8211; this is where you get objects whether you call them brown dwarfs, giant Jupiter planets.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Brown dwarfs is the common nomenclature and we just don&#8217;t know where to start calling things stars or not.  If you get too small, stars only burn Deuterium.  This is heavy Hydrogen &#8211; Hydrogen that consists of a proton and a neutron in the center.  They&#8217;ll do this for a few million years, run out of the Deuterium and then do nothing.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t even contract down to white dwarfs.  They just sit there and do nothing.  This is where you sort of go, is this a star?  Is this a something that&#8217;s not really a planet?  What is it?  And we argue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right and so it&#8217;s almost like a ball of Hydrogen and Helium just sitting there.  If a bunch of them collided they could turn into a star but it&#8217;s just going to sit there forever.  It heats up because it&#8217;s compressing down from the thermal heat&#8230;.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Right that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  But then that&#8217;s that.  Once it gets to its &#8220;happy place&#8221; it just [Laughter] cools down and just sits there as a cold ball of Hydrogen.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Right and these are objects that are bigger than about 13 Jupiter masses so here we&#8217;re not even talking in terms of planetary Jupiter masses.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>These are objects that you take Jupiter, multiply by 13 and do you call that a star or not &#8211; and we&#8217;re not sure.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay so the low end of the scale &#8211; very slow, very calm.  Now let&#8217;s kick around the other side. [Laughter] Let&#8217;s start looking bigger and bigger.  When does something interesting happen bigger than our Sun?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Actually the interesting stuff starts to happen at as little as one and one half times the size of the Sun.  With something the size of the Sun, you go through Hydrogen burning in the core.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you&#8217;re done burning Hydrogen the star collapses a bit.  In the process of collapsing it ends up with something called a degenerate core.  This is the same sort of material that white dwarf stars are made out of.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Helium in this is packed together so tightly that the electrons basically form what we call a degenerate gas.  Long story short, when a star like our Sun goes from having a Helium core with a shell of burning Hydrogen around it to collapse, collapse, eventually that Helium does what we call a Helium flash. It bloats up really big all of a sudden.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a rather catastrophic process.  The star survives but it&#8217;s rather sudden.  If you have a star that&#8217;s just one and a half times the size of the Sun, you don&#8217;t have to worry about that flash anymore.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Instead you have actually a convective core here.  So you go again to having a convective core with in this case a radiative envelope &#8211; you end up with more mixing, you end up with a smoother process to get the Helium burning in the center &#8211; and you smoothly transition to burning heavier and heavier elements in the core of the star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So how heavy an element will you burn?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong>  This is where it starts to matter again just how big a star are you looking at. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Well let&#8217;s look at that 1.4 times the mass of the Sun&#8217;s star.  How far is it going to get?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> With that star we&#8217;ll actually end up with Carbon burning in the center.  You end up with a nice happy, friendly star that doesn&#8217;t do anything too catastrophic in its life and ends up as a white dwarf.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now, what would it be a white dwarf made out of?  In this case, it has been able to burn Carbon in its core so it&#8217;s not going to end up as a great big diamond like our Sun.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No, here you&#8217;re going to end up with an Oxygen-Neon-Sodium-Magnesium down in the center of the star.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  WOW!  The world&#8217;s biggest whatever that is.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> [Laughter] And I&#8217;m not quite sure at this point.  Where it starts to get interesting is where you get stars that are bigger than 5 solar masses.  This is where you start getting Neon burning going on as well.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Even though we don&#8217;t think of it, once you start getting to these stars that are bigger than 5 solar masses, if they don&#8217;t undergo vast amounts of mass loss, these stars can actually start undergoing different types of death in the form of supernova.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  When do we see neutron stars?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Exactly when we get neutron stars &#8211; they&#8217;re a product of supernova explosions and it depends on whose models you listen to.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay, well then we&#8217;ll come back around when we see the output being neutron stars.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And it all depends on mass losses. But in this case what ends up happening is with the Neon burning.  You start to get a degenerate core again just like you did the last time with our Sun.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Except in this case the Helium flash for the Sun &#8211; not too catastrophic &#8211; but when you start getting to more exciting forms of flashes, these can actually detonate the entire Star.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So when you get like Neon flash or a Magnesium flash?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In this case when you get Neon flashes going on, you get an exploding star.  Again you can get this with the Oxygen burning, with the Silicon burning.  So as we get to these more and more massive stars it&#8217;s with 5 solar masses that you start getting the Neon burning.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>With 10 solar masses you get Oxygen burning.  With 20 solar masses you get Silicon burning.  With each of these different sets of burning, when they hit their end result and start to collapse down, eventually that end result &#8211; except when you get to Iron &#8211; tries to ignite.  When it ignites, it blows the star apart.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, same thing.  You&#8217;ve got each of these situations &#8211; so it gives off more energy.  When you go from Neon to a heavier element, the output is still more energy and so that&#8217;s where the energy from the explosion comes from?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yes, so with your 5 solar mass you happily burn Neon.  But then the Magnesium flash blows the star apart.  With your approximately 10 solar mass stars, you happily get Oxygen burning.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Again, here you&#8217;re starting to get Magnesium to Sulfur forming in the core. When these ignite, they blow the star apart.  Then once you hit approximately 20 solar masses you end up burning Silicon in the core.  You end up burning all the way up to elements as high as Iron on the periodic table.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Iron can&#8217;t burn, so in this case you have a star that starts to collapse and collapse and collapse and in the process it ends up causing massive thermonuclear reactions.  And again the star blows itself apart.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now I understand that the more mass of the star the higher the element that it can burn, but why does Oxygen blow one star apart while something further up the chain blows another star apart?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t they all just blow up when they get to Oxygen burning?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It has to do with this crazy concept of degenerate gas.  You can end up with gases in a lot of different densities.  One particular situation you pack the atoms together so tightly that the electrons end up basically forming a matrix.  Everything is packed together and it can&#8217;t move essentially.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you try to ignite this, the process of igniting a degenerate gas is a radical phase transition.  It&#8217;s like suddenly going from solid to gas except in this case you&#8217;re going from degenerate gas to non-degenerate gas.  That&#8217;s violent.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now if you have a star that is hot enough and dense enough that it never collapses down into degenerate gas, it can just smoothly go: &#8220;okay, I&#8217;m hot, but I&#8217;m not that dense so I&#8217;ll go from burning Helium to burning Carbon.&#8221; </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The bigger a star is, the hotter its core is.  The hotter the core is, the more energy is being created and that energy pushes out on the outer layers of the star allowing the center to be less dense.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Oh, I see.  It&#8217;s like when you get it&#8217;s almost like the right temperature of the core compared to the shell that you have next in line and you don&#8217;t have enough heat and pressure to make it non-degenerate &#8211; or keep it all fluffy &#8211; then it collapses and that&#8217;s when you get the eminent explosion. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is completely non-intuitive.  Just the fact that our Sun &#8211; happy little star- is going through life and will eventually end up with a degenerate Helium core, which is denser than a non-degenerate Helium core (which is what you would get with a bigger star).  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>So, you take a star bigger than the Sun, it&#8217;s hotter in the core and is able to be fluffier (to use your word) than a smaller star than our Sun that doesn&#8217;t have enough heat to keep its core fluffy.  It&#8217;s mathematically fun to play with.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  It totally makes sense to me.  It makes intuitive sense as well so don&#8217;t worry about it being non-intuitive.  [Laughter] You heat up the core, and when it&#8217;s really, really hot it&#8217;s like the heat is what makes liquids turn into gas.  Heat is what makes the molecules go very quickly.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>So, the hotter you can make it, even the farther along up the table of elements you can keep things buzzing around.  But if you&#8217;re not quite hot enough then it can get a chance to cool down enough to lock into that degenerate state.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then when it is time to ignite as fusion instead of it just sort of smoothly starting up, it just goes ka-blamo.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> One of the things that we struggle with in trying to understand exactly how these stars die is this thing called mass loss.  As the stars are blasting energy out from their core, sometimes they blast their atmosphere apart in the same process.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are these very high mass stars called Wolf-Raet stars.  They&#8217;re burning energy in their cores so fast that they end up with these tremendous winds of particles.  They&#8217;re losing mass at a regular rate.  The question is are they going to start generating energy a little less violently before they blow themselves apart entirely?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>We think with a lot of these stars they actually end up going supernova.  The thing is, if they lose too much mass then it calms them down and they&#8217;re able to go on to less dangerous things in life.  This makes it hard for us to figure out.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If a star starts off with say, 20 solar masses but is undergoing huge amounts of mass loss, it&#8217;s not going to keep those 20 solar masses.  So, which of these stars die violently, which is a type of supernova, which ones end up producing neutron stars, which ones end up producing white dwarfs?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I heard one scientist once say that any star that starts out with a mass less than 10 solar masses is going to undergo so much mass loss that it will end up reducing itself down to a star that only becomes a white dwarf.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>But, there are some textbooks that you look in and they say that any star that is greater than 3 solar masses is going to end up becoming a neutron star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>So, trying to figure out mass loss ends up kind of putting a crimp on our estimations of what stars undergo which fate. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  This is not a scientific debate that has been solved to anybody&#8217;s satisfaction.  [Laughter] So you&#8217;re going to get people arguing that small stars might become neutron stars. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And other people are going to say even if you start out with a star with ten times the mass of the Sun it&#8217;s going to live such a violent life and give off so much of its mass that it might not even make it to supernova. Or it might just turn into a white dwarf.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is what keeps astronomy interesting.  You also have to play into things like the metalicity of the star because that affects things.  There are all sorts of neat things to play with.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s just other little neat ways to kill a star.  Lots of stars, most stars actually have companions.  They&#8217;re in binary systems; they&#8217;re in systems of 3 stars in some cases.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you put 2 stars too close together they can actually start to pull matter one off of the other using gravity.  This will radically change the evolutionary path of both stars.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Can you have them merge?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In some cases yes.  This is where it starts to get really cool.  There&#8217;s models of crazy systems in which you have 2 white dwarfs that spiral toward each other, heat one another up, become non-degenerate and end up reigniting as a new star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a couple of papers &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re to be believed or not &#8211; that say that our Aurora Borealis stars &#8211; stars that periodically just suddenly drop many many magnitudes because they&#8217;re giving off a hunk of dust &#8211; that say that perhaps these are Aurora Borealis stars caused by the merger of white dwarfs.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is not the primary thing that people say.  They were just papers that amused me.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now there&#8217;s one kind of star that we haven&#8217;t talked about which were the population 3 stars, right?  The first stars to ever form.  They didn&#8217;t have any metal so I&#8217;m just wondering sort of how their life cycle was.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In this case you start looking at what sort of nuclear reactions are possible.  If all you have is Hydrogen and Helium, you can do what are called the proton-proton chains.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>These is where you take 2 protons, slam them together and get Deuterium and then take the Deuterium and Hydrogen and get a Helium<sup>3 </sup>and then you throw the Helium<sup>3 </sup>s and you can eventually get to Helium<sup>4 </sup>which is completely stable and a couple more protons.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a not very exciting way to generate energy but it works and ends up burning Hydrogen into Helium.  In some cases you can get the Helium burning into Beryllium.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>You can get to Lithium but if all you have is the Hydrogen-Helium and trace amounts of Lithium and Beryllium it&#8217;s very, very hard to get beyond this.  There is a resonance that crops in at a temperature of 10 to the 8 degrees Kelvin.  This allows you to start having Helium<sup>4 </sup>atoms.  These are atoms that have 2 protons and 2 neutrons in their cores coming together and going to Beryllium<sup>8.</sup>  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>They go back and forth from these two different states pretty much in resonance.  Because of this you can end up in some cases getting the Beryllium and the Helium coming together and producing Carbon.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is where you&#8217;re finally able to start getting the heavier elements.  Once you have that Carbon, you can finally start to have the CNO 24:21 cycle but you have to get to that temperature of 10 to the 8 degrees Kelvin.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  What was the life cycle of those first stars probably like?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, it&#8217;s kinda cool. They were actually able to form much larger than we can get stars right now.  Right now above a certain temperature you just burn Carbon because we have Carbon all over the place now.  Because of this when you get a star of above I think 150 solar masses the star just goes straight to burning Carbon in its core.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;Fine, I&#8217;m big, I&#8217;m hot, and I&#8217;m dense in the core so I&#8217;m going to burn Carbon.&#8221;  But back then, they didn&#8217;t have this Carbon right off the bat so you could get stars that were 250 solar masses or so.  It was all because there wasn&#8217;t any Carbon so you could grow much, much larger stars.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>You also had regular stars going through the proton-proton cycle; burning through the fuel; burning into regular stuff and burning themselves out.  What we don&#8217;t know is what the initial mass function of these stars was.  We don&#8217;t know how many little ones were formed. Probably not many or any because we can&#8217;t find them and they should still be alive.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right.  Like even those red dwarf stars that were formed right at the beginning, we should see them still burning away.  They would have no metal in them whatsoever.  They would just be Hydrogen and Helium.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And we&#8217;re not finding them.  We&#8217;re not finding stars just a little bit smaller than the Sun that should still be out there.  So this tells us something about the initial mass flexion 25:52 of the stars.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There weren&#8217;t small ones that are still around to be found.  It appears that it was the largest stars that burned themselves out the fastest that just collectively pulled themselves together in the first moments died almost instantly.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The biggest stars were only living for a few million years.  As they died on cosmic scales instantly they spread throughout the universe heavier elements.  As they were appearing in random locations, dying in random locations they were able to enrich stars before that first generation of stars used up all the material. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>You can just imagine the biggest stars formed first.  They finished forming perhaps before the first small stars ever formed and thus enriched the very first little red dwarf star that ever formed.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Hmm. And you can probably imagine that there was a tremendous amount of mass loss going on those stars.  I&#8217;ve heard they had gigantic solar winds, right?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Gigantic solar winds &#8211; it was a violent place early on in the universe.  They were giving off gamma rays, X-rays, and they&#8217;re just living and dying so fast.  Small stars take more time to gravitationally collapse.  Everything slowed down with the small star.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> Can you imagine what the sky must have looked like?  Obviously there weren&#8217;t even planets but you could stand there and it would be just like the sky around you just popping off in all directions.  Amazing &#8211; pop, pop, pop&#8230; [Laughter]</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And galaxies were still forming.  Everything was still sort of Picasso in nature you might say; those crazy colors and crazy shapes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Amazing.  Okay well I think we&#8217;ve covered the life cycle of the smaller and the bigger.  That was great.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;ve actually done two more episodes about how stars are born and how stars die where we cover the different kinds of supernova in a lot more detail.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you want more information on that, we&#8217;ve purposely glossed over that a bit, you can check those out.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file.  It has been edited for clarity.  Transcription and editing by Cindy Leonard.</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/10/ep-109-the-life-of-other-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 109: The Life of Other Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/10/ep-109-the-life-of-other-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-081006.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Last week we looked at the complete life of the Sun, birth to death. But stars can be smaller, and stars can get much much larger. And with a change in mass, their lives change too. Let&#039;s start the clock again,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Last week we looked at the complete life of the Sun, birth to death. But stars can be smaller, and stars can get much much larger. And with a change in mass, their lives change too. Let&#039;s start the clock again, and see what happens to the smallest star...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 108: The Life of the Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-108-the-life-of-the-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-108-the-life-of-the-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Solar System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve talked about the Sun before, but this time we&#8217;re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun, and all the stages it&#8217;s going to go through: solar nebula, protostar, main sequence, red giant, white dwarf, and more. Want to know what the future holds for the Sun, get ready for the [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-108-the-life-of-the-sun/' addthis:title='Ep. 108: The Life of the Sun '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve talked about the Sun before, but this time we&#8217;re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun, and all the stages it&#8217;s going to go through: solar nebula, protostar, main sequence, red giant, white dwarf, and more. Want to know what the future holds for the Sun, get ready for the grim details.</p>
<p><span id="more-384"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080929.mp3">Ep. 108: The Life of the Sun</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<p><strong>Overviews:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/bmendez/ay10/2000/cycle/cycle.html">Stellar Life Cycle flow Chart </a></li>
<li><a href="http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/rel_stars.html">The Life and Death of Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/star_intro.html">The Natures of the Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nmm.ac.uk/explore/astronomy-and-time/astronomy-facts/stars/stellar-evolution/stellar-evolution-the-life-and-death-of-stars">Stellar Evolution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://aspire.cosmic-ray.org/labs/star_life/starlife_main.html">Life Cycle of a Star</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.keele.ac.uk/workx/starlife/StarpageS_26M.html">The Life of a Star</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-sun/">Everything you need to know about the sun from Universe Today&#8217;s Guide to Space</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>And the details&#8230;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/Protostars.html">Protostars </a>&#8211; from Astrophysics Spectator</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protostar">Protostars </a>&#8211; from Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/H/Hayashi_track.html">Hayashi Track </a>&#8211; from Internet Encyclopedia of Science</li>
<li><a href="http://cseligman.com/text/stars/mldiagram.htm">Mass-Luminosity Diagram</a> &#8212; from Courtney Seligman</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/documentation/pressReleases/2004/pressRelease20041028/">Paper on the sun&#8217;s activity for the past 8,000 years </a>&#8211; from Max Planck Society</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;id=1224">Jupiter gives off more heat than it gets from the sun</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/accretiond.html">Accretion disk -</a>- from Internet Encyclopedia of Science</li>
<li><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FIAU%2FIAU2004_IAUS224%2FS1743921304004612a.pdf&amp;code=ec6ec6254d44fbabe5fb4dfe7e2a40f0">Paper on magnetic fields of stars </a>&#8211; from IAU</li>
<li><a href="http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/stellarevolution_mainsequence.html">Main sequence stars</a> &#8212; from CSIRO</li>
<li><a href="http://www.essex1.com/people/speer/main.html">Table of main sequence star data</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/Fusion.html">Nuclear Fusion of Stars -</a>- from Astrophysics Spectator</li>
<li><a href="http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/stellarevolution_postmain.html">Post-Main Sequence Stars and Helium Flash</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/Collapse.html">Gravitational Collapse of Stars</a> &#8212; Astrophysics Spectator</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ucolick.org/~bolte/AY4/notes10/node2.html">Horizontal Branch Stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/edu/formal/variable_stars/">Variable Stars </a>&#8211; from Chandra&#8217;s website</li>
<li>Variable Stars &#8212; <a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/star-formation/episode-22-variable-stars/">see Episode 22 </a></li>
<li>Check out <a href="http://www.aavso.org/">American Association of Variable Star Observers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/M/Mira_variable.html">Mira Variable stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/pauli.html">Pauli Exclusion Principle</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astro.umd.edu/educationalresources/astro/stev/wdwarf.html">Diamonds in the sky &#8212; White Dwarf stars</a></li>
<li><a href="http://seds.org/Messier/glob.html">Globular Clusters</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/will-earth-survive-when-the-sun-becomes-a-red-giant/">Will the Earth Survive When the Sun Becomes a Red Giant? </a>&#8211; Universe Today</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>A few papers on star formation:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0807.4928">Protostar Formation in the Early Universe</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0808.3013">Properties of Protostars in the Elephant Trunk Globule</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0807.3801">Problems of Star Formation Theories and Prospects of Submillimeter Observations</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0806.4122">Evolution of Massive Protostars with High Accretion Rates</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Misc:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_expansion.html">Expansion Rate of the Universe</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Should-You-Drink-Red-Wine?&amp;id=516156">Should you drink red wine?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.astroleague.org/weekly/astrocast-2008-10-04.html">World Cast, Oct. 4 &#8212; starring Dr. Pamela Gay! &#8220;The Origins of the Universe&#8221; </a> Live webcast, 20:00 UT</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<h3>Transcript: The Life of the Sun</h3>
<div id="transcript">
<strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-080929_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Dr. Fraser Cain:</strong> This wasn’t our intention but we’re actually coming up with another series.  We talked about the Sun last time and we’re going to talk about the Sun today and maybe we’ll talk about the Sun next week.  I don’t really know.  </p>
<p><strong>Dr. Pamela Gay:</strong> We just have too many big ideas that refuse to be confined to 30 minutes.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> I know.  This could be one show, this could be two shows, I don’t really know.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> We’ll see where we go.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Exactly, we’ll just let the show decide.  We’ve talked about the Sun before.  This time we’re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun and all the stages it’s going to go through, Solar Nebula, Protostar, Main Sequence, Red Giant, White Dwarf and more.  So if you want to know what the past held and what the future holds for the Sun get ready for the grim details.  [Laughter] And of course this will always end on a sad note.  <br />
<br />
Okay Pamela, I think the goal here today is to go through in excruciating detail all of the stages of the Sun.  It is actually really amazing all the crazy stuff that happens.  So let’s rewind time all the way back to 4.6 billion years ago plus plus and talk about what came first. </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, once upon a time there was nothing more than a giant cloud of gas and dust.  That’s the boring part.  We don’t know how long that cloud of gas and dust just sorta hung out doing nothing other than maybe glowing faintly.  Somewhere along the line that cloud of gas and dust was caused to contract; caused to fragment and turn itself into a bunch of baby Stars.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now the key is that it was a cold cloud, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yes.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  And not a hot cloud.  If you get a hot cloud of gas it will never contract.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is because temperatures related to the rate at which Particles are flying around.  If you have something hot the Particles are bouncing around, bouncing off of each other and it’s hard to get that to collapse down because you have this thermal pressure holding the cloud apart basically.  <br />
<br />
But if you have cold gas and dust that is just hanging out in Space and you whack it, it will start to condense.  As the gas and dust fills a smaller and smaller volume, Gravity will start to drive that contraction faster.  <br />
<br />
We talk about the point at which something starts to identify itself as being the beginnings of a Star as the Hayashi track.  With a Star like our Sun, it actually started out about ten times brighter than it is right now as it started to contract off of this Hayashi track. <br />
<br />
So for several million years, we’re not exactly sure how long this process takes, the Sun contracted and actually got fainter as it contracted and then started nuclear burning in its core.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> So before it was bright but it wasn’t burning with nuclear fusion in its core?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No, it was actually all thermal heat.   This is sort of what Jupiter is doing.  Jupiter actually gives off more light than it is simply reflecting from the Sun.  If you turned the Sun off, Jupiter would still be giving off light.  <br />
<br />
This is because gas that is being held together, being pushed together, being squished together by Gravity actually emits thermal radiation for many billions of years.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right so the first few million years of the Sun, it was just a ball of Hydrogen and Helium held together by the Gravity and just headed up by that process.  No fusion necessary.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The best way to think of this is it’s the opposite of spray air.  When you spray your hand with spray air, it’s really cold because the gas is expanding.  In this case we’re squishing the gas together and it’s heating up.  So, gas squished, heated up and eventually it starts nuclear burning.  <br />
<br />
This process probably started with Deuterium burning.  This is where you’re burning up bits of Hydrogen Atoms that have an extra Neutron in them.  These actually burn a lot easier than just regular run of the mill Hydrogen.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  And where did those come from?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Those probably came from the Big Bang.  So we’re burning up the building blocks of the Universe basically.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  The point being that it’s like at early enough on you didn’t have the conditions to fuse Hydrogen yet, but you still had a few left over chunks of Deuterium and those could start to fuse together.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Eventually you do end up with nice friendly Hydrogen burning in the center of the Sun.  Over the process of getting to that stage the Sun first overheats a little bit and then cools down to settle into a nice friendly what we call main sequence life.  This is the first big main part of saying that is a Star.  <br />
<br />
So we go from protostar which is the process of going off of the Hayashi track to contracting to just settling down into nice round Star that has also along the way blasted everything out from around it.  <br />
<br />
During the early parts of the Sun’s life, they go through many radical stages with lots of x-ray flares, lots of high energy output.  They go through their own form of “the terrible twos” that includes High Energy Radiation. </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now why are they so violent and active at that stage?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> As they collapse there’s material streaming on to them.  Our Solar System is basically an Accretion Disk at this point, a disk of material where some of that material is just streaming on to the Star in the center.  <br />
<br />
You have powerful Magnetic Fields in many cases.  You can have jets coming off of the poles of the Star.  All of these different interactions can lead to flares as the Star settles down.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So it’s almost like new chunks of material are landing on the Star and that causes flares.  It wasn’t that inflow of material that causes the Star to settle down.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> We also don’t know exactly what the details of the Magnetic Field evolution at this point is because you have all these Magnetic Field lines that are rearranging themselves as well.  There is lots of potential for badness to be going on.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now the Sun has finally settled down to its Main Sequence.  But that was like four and a half billion years ago, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> So depending on what paper you read, the protostar stage could have taken hundreds of thousands of years or a few million years.  That’s a short stage to get nice solid Star formation going on and to get our Planets formed and to get everything lined up so that we have a Solar System that looked like the Solar System we live in today although the terrestrial surfaces were very different.  The pieces were all there.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, but how does the Sun look?  We’re still on a Main Sequence phase, how does the Sun look different when it started the Main Sequence to where it is today?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Its temperature has changed slightly.  It was a little bit hotter in the past – our Sun has actually cooled off some over the years.  Once it hits the Main Sequence Stage, it’s a fairly constant Sun.  We’ve had a bit of cooling off but our Planets found other ways through gases and stuff to keep going in a way that works for us.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  But how is it changing – even though it’s in the Main Sequence – it must be changing a little bit, right?  Hydrogen is getting fused into Helium.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> There are long term changes in temperature.  Over time our Sun is now heating up again. So we went from being hotter and the Sun cooled off and now slowly we’re getting warmer and warmer over time.  It’s a gradual enough process that even over those 5 billion years; terrestrial effects have been really what have dominated the situation here on the planet Earth.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay so the Sun is getting hotter – we’re not talking like a cause for global warming – we’re talking billions of years.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Right, so it’s only in like 50 million years from now that we’re going to have to start worrying about the temperature has gone up enough that it starts to affect the planet Earth.  <br />
<br />
If you look at people who look at long term cycles in the Sun, there are a lot of them who believe for a variety of reasons that are hidden in the field of Solar Astronomy, that our Sun is actually in the process of a cooling period that has to do with how the Magnetic Field is evolving over time.  There’s lots of long term and short term changes in the Sun’s behavior.  <br />
<br />
We think that there is currently a short term slight cooling phase going on but that’s superimposed over a long term heating of the Sun that about 50 million years from now is going to start to impact us.  The Sun actually will stay a Main Sequence Star for probably another 5 billion years.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, so we’re only not even halfway through the process yet.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong>  It’s middle-aged still though because the periods that come after it are so short that we can start to look at ourselves as being in our mid-40s if you are talking about someone who lives to be 100. </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Then I guess at some point – we’ve talked about this before – that the heat from the Sun is going to start to really impact our Planet, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah.  This is where we start having our oceans heating up.  That leads to higher humidity in the air which leads to the Planet heating up more which of course heats the oceans more and eventually the oceans evaporate – total runaway Greenhouse Effect.  No more life on Planet Earth.  It’s rather depressing but our Universe is after all trying to kill us.  [Laughter]</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  We’ve covered that before.  [Laughter] I’ve seen some competing series on this but essentially 500 million to a billion years from now there will be no liquid water.  Water vapor will have boiled off into Space.  We’ll essentially be very much like Venus, just a little cooler.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  We’re on our way to Venus.  So, Earth doesn’t matter anymore.  [Laughter] The Sun is still a concern.  That’s still like 3 billion years from now.  So when do things get interesting again?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> About 5 billion years from now we start to run out of Hydrogen that is readily available for fusing in the center of the Sun.  When this happens the Sun is going to start contracting because there is not going to be as much pressure from the light supporting the outer layers of the Star.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  This is kinda interesting because even though there is tons and tons of Hydrogen in the whole Sun and if you could somehow mix it all back up again – give it a stir – the Sun could just go on for hundreds of billions of years, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is what happens in little tiny tiny Stars.  The burning process is able to create what we call convective mixing.  The entire Star essentially acts like a Lava Lamp.  It’s able to constantly refuel the center of the Star.  <br />
<br />
As you get to bigger and bigger Stars like our Sun, you reach the point where that mixing no longer takes place.  So as you’re burning Hydrogen into heavier elements in the center of the Sun, those heavy elements stay there.  You end up building up a Helium core to our Sun.  <br />
<br />
Once the core is exhausted of its Hydrogen fuel the Sun will begin to collapse and it will reach the point where a shell of Hydrogen around that Helium core is able to ignite. The densities around the core get high enough and the temperatures get hot enough just from the weight of everything resting on them that we burn a shell of Hydrogen.  <br />
<br />
At this point we talk about the Sun being off the Main Sequence and the next really interesting phase starts to occur once you reach the stage that you get a Helium Flash.  For awhile you have what we call a Red Giant Branch Star.  This is where you’re burning the shell of Hydrogen but the Star is still collapsing.  <br />
<br />
The Sun is still getting smaller and smaller and the center of the Sun is getting hotter and hotter under the weight of this collapsing material above it.  The pressures are getting higher as everything is getting confined into a smaller and smaller area.  <br />
<br />
In a magical moment when it reaches a temperature ten to the 8 degrees, suddenly the Helium in the center of the Sun is able to ignite.  We call this a Helium Flash.  At this point the Sun becomes what we call a Horizontal Branch Star.  Now you have a new segment in the evolution of the Sun.  This phase can also be called the sub-giant phase of the Star.  Here you have the Star happily burning Helium, it bloats itself back out. It gets hotter in the core once you get this new burning going on.  You get more light pressure supporting the outer layers of the Star, Star bloats out.  It also drops in luminosity here.  <br />
<br />
This is one of the neat trade-offs that is happening with the Star. It’s constantly changing every so slightly in brightness and in temperature as it goes through all these different phases.  So once the Hydrogen shot off, the Star got much redder. Now that you have the Helium burning, the Star gets a little bit bluer again and that’s kind of cool.  Eventually the Helium also exhausts itself in the center of the Sun.  <br />
<br />
All of the Helium ends up burning itself out into Carbon.  Here again you end up with shell burning.  So now you have this Carbon core surrounded by a shell of Helium that’s burning itself surrounded by a shell of Hydrogen that’s burning.  So you start getting Onion15:11 of Sun.  This is where we talk about the Star being a Red Giant again.  Exactly what happens depends a little bit on metalisty15:19 of the Star. <br />
<br />
In a lot of cases as it goes through these phases we can also end up with it being what’s called a Variable Star where it pulsates in brightness.  This happens to Stars that are just like our Sun.  They can go through a phase of pulsations as they go along.  As they start running out of all this fuel, this is where we call them Mira Variables.  They’re giant, they’re bloated; the outermost layers of the Star are thinner than the Earth’s atmosphere which is kind of cool to think about.  <br />
<br />
This is where you start to spread our Sun out over a volume that just fits – maybe we think – within the Earth’s Orbit.  We don’t know for certain.  And you also start getting Mass loss in Space as the nuclear burning is going on. The outer layers of the Atmosphere have expanded out so far that sometimes just a slight push from the core of the Star which is sputtering as it burns is able to cause puffs of the Atmosphere to drift away.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  And the red color is just coming from it being cooler, am I right?  Back in the olden days the Sun was white because it was a temperature of nearly 6000 degrees Kelvin and now it’s cooled down even though it’s a lot larger, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> So here we’re starting to get down to 4000 degrees Kelvin. This change in temperature is enough to change its color so that it’s a deep red.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  But the overall brightness of the Sun is way higher.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is because you have a much larger surface area that the light is going through.  Each bit of that surface area is able to radiate away Photons and all those Photons add up to being a much brighter Star.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So even though the Sun is changed to red, it’s now visible from a much further distance than it was before.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is part of why so many of the really bright Stars that we see in the Sky are these red Stars.  We can just see red Stars at a much greater distance and this is a common phase for Stars to go through.  What’s kind of amazing is the time scales that all of this has been happening on.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  That’s just what I was going to ask – how long does this last?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Our Sun hangs out on the Main Sequence for a few billion years – like 10ish billion years.  Then it only spends a few hundred millions years going through all the rest of the stages.  So those are relatively short stages in a Star’s life.  <br />
<br />
We refer to the Main Sequence as the majority of the Star’s life and that’s exactly what it is.  Then it goes off and does all these really cool things but those happen essentially in the blink of a Cosmic eye.  Once the Star hits the Mira phase, just maybe four or five hundred million years after leaving the Main Sequence, at that point it starts losing its Atmosphere.  <br />
<br />
It starts transitioning from being a Star that’s burning and doing all the Star-like things to blasting its Atmosphere away starting to form a Planetary Nebula.  A Planetary Nebula is nothing more than the Atmosphere of a Star that’s been exhaled and hasn’t yet drifted so far away from its starting point that we can no longer see all the gas associated with one another.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  What’s the mechanism that actually gets the Atmosphere away from the Sun?  Like what’s blowing it away?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It’s the flickering and sputtering of these shells of burning Hydrogen and Helium.  As the Star collapses down you’ll get a burst of extra light that pushes things away.  The Star is so big that Gravity and Light are just barely in balance and it’s very easy to overcome that Gravity of the outer layers of the Star.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> You almost get it kicking as it’s normally in balance and then it maybe sputters and gets brighter and more light pressure per second and then contracts but it’s enough of a push to shove off that outside layer.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> There’s also this constant Solar Wind that’s going out where you have this light pressure pushing out and it’s always able to remove some amount of the Star’s Mass.  We’re just not entirely sure how much of the Star’s Mass.  <br />
<br />
What’s really amazing is we’re now able to start looking at detailed maps of the environments around some of these Stars and see all sorts of crazy strange structures that have formed during Planetary Nebula phases.  We don’t understand what causes all of these different strange shapes.  <br />
<br />
There is different Planetary Nebula that looks like a series of nested boxes, a series of nested rings, figure eights and all of these are coming from fairly similar parent objects.  But there’s something that is causing it to look radically different in just how the Atmospheres were lost to form these Nebula.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Magnetic Fields. </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> [Laughter] That’s the thing we always blame.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay, so now our Sun is in this Mira phase, puffing off outside layers into Space….</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Eventually it reaches the point where between Mass loss and just burning up what little fuel it has, it starts to run out of Energy.  The Helium burning shuts down.  The Hydrogen burning shuts down.  And the last of the Atmosphere just drifts away.  <br />
<br />
At this point you now have a hot cinder of a Star.  That cinder of a Star collapses down.  It no longer has any burning going on to support the Atoms against one another.  As they collapse they actually reach a degenerate gas phase.  This is where the Hydrogen and Helium Atoms pack themselves so closely together that the only way the Electrons can still exist is if they basically form a Matrix.  <br />
<br />
You end up with Stars that their internal structure is essentially a diamond of Carbon surrounded by these extremely dense – we call them degenerate layers – of Hydrogen and Helium as well.  These are our White Dwarf Stars.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right and so you’ve gotten a situation where the Gravity is so intense that it’s packing the Carbon and the Helium and all that’s left into a sphere but there isn’t enough Gravity to actually ignite fusion of the Carbon.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In the process of packing everything together it gets so close that the pressure of the Electrons one against the other going: “no, you have the same charge as I do stay away,” and the poly-exclusion principle that are working to support the Star.  <br />
<br />
If you made White Dwarfs any heavier you’d be able to overcome this and you’d squish everything down into being a Neutron Star which we will get to in a couple more episodes.  <br />
<br />
But the remnants of Stars like our Sun are supported not by light but by Electron pressure.  That’s kind of neat to think of Electrons supporting a star.  These are the largest diamonds we have in the Universe.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Is it actually a diamond?  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah, it just might be.  If you think about it, what a diamond is. It is nothing more than Carbon Atoms that have been arranged in a Matrix which is one of the tightest structures that you can get those Carbon Atoms into.  That’s why diamonds are so hard.  <br />
<br />
As you’re creating a White Dwarf you have to pack those Carbon Atoms down into a crystalline structure.  That’s where you start getting something that is basically nothing more than a really HOT diamond.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, if you could cool it down and survive the Gravity and chop pieces off you could turn them into diamond rings. [Laughter] </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yes.  You would have to wait a long time for them to cool off though.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I’m a patient man. It’s a new business.  Anyone want to go into business with me [Laughter] in the Inter-stellar diamonds?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> You want your one Solar Mass diamond, don’t you?</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Yeah, exactly.  So then, but it’s not dead yet, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It’s still radiating heat.  It’s still hot.  This is the situation of Captain Kirk heats up the rock with his phaser and it takes a little while for the rock to cool down.  Well, White Dwarfs are a lot bigger than that rock and it takes them millions of years to cool off.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Billions, trillions….</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It depends on how cool you want to get them.  So they’re cooling off over time and as these White Dwarfs cool off, the Planetary Nebula they sit in the center of also fades away as it expands away.  You’re essentially watching the home of the Star disappear.  <br />
<br />
Its Atmosphere is dispersing moving further and further away from that Core White Dwarf.  The Star itself is getting cooler and as it is getting cooler it’s getting fainter and fainter.  <br />
<br />
Eventually you end up with that gas and dust in the Planetary Nebula just sort of mixes itself in with the rest of the Cosmos.  The White Dwarf over billions of years cools off to the temperature of Space.  It’s a kinda sad future.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right and we call that a Black Dwarf, right?  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah, it depends on who you talk to.  People are kind of nervous about using the phrase Black Dwarf because too many people mix it up with Black Hole, but that is one of the terms kicking around.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  It there some super Scientific term?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay, some kind of degenerate …..</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Cold White Dwarf also works.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  A Cold White Dwarf, okay.  That’s very scientific sounding. [Laughter] Now what do we see?  If we look out into the Universe, how far along that do we see White Dwarfs?  Are there White Dwarfs that are just now too cool for us to be able to see them?  Too cool for school?  [Laughter] </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> We don’t think so.  The Universe hasn’t quite been around that long.  One of the neat things that’s happening is we can look out at Globular Clusters, packages of in some case thousands of Stars, that are gravitationally bound together and are orbiting our Milky Way Galaxy.  These are some of the oldest objects that we know of, formed 13 or 14 billion years ago depending on whose Stellar Evolution Models you believe.  <br />
<br />
When we look at them &#8211; we can use Hubble Space Telescope to probe fainter and fainter until we start to pull out the White Dwarfs &#8211; we can actually see what we call the White Dwarf cooling sequence.  <br />
<br />
This is where you see a sequence of Stars in a plot of temperature vs. brightness that forms a nice polite line where the brighter ones are also bluer and the fainter ones are also redder.  There is a direct relationship between how bright they are and what temperature they are forming a perfectly straight line.  We can see where we stop getting Stars.  <br />
<br />
This is part of how we come up with the age of these Globular Clusters is we know, okay the first Stars to be able to form White Dwarfs were Foo and they burned through their stuff fairly quickly because they were higher Mass, had large amounts of Mass loss and eventually ended up dying with only 1.4ish Solar Masses of material after all of their Mass loss.  <br />
<br />
Then they collapsed down into White Dwarfs.  And then Stars that were a little bit less massive collapsed down to White Dwarfs.  And then Stars that were even less massive collapsed down to White Dwarfs.  The Stars that became White Dwarfs later are still hotter than the ones that formed first which are still cooler.  There aren’t any that have had time to reach the point that they’re too cool for school as you put it.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, so you can look at a cluster, count up the number of White Dwarfs count up the number of Stars and get a sense of how old that cluster is.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong>  This is one of the many ways that we work to confirm the ages of systems.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right.  Now is there going to be any time then – I mean the Sun is going to be slowly cooling down – is there anything left?  Will there be some time down the road where maybe Jupiter crashes into the Sun?  [Laughter] You know the White Dwarf Sun and you get re-ignition? </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No, probably not.  It just doesn’t have quite enough Mass to do anything quite that exciting.  One of the interesting questions is going to be what happens as the Sun loses Mass through it’s – we call it the Asymptotic Giant Branch Phase – that period of time where it’s essentially a Mira variable.  It’s going to be undergoing huge amounts of Mass loss as the Mass leaves the Atmosphere and starts to form another Planetary Nebula.  <br />
<br />
As that Mass is lost – first of all, it’s blasting the Planets – but second of all that Mass is no longer holding the Planets in their present orbits.  This is going to cause the Earth’s orbit to get bigger; the Mars orbit to get bigger; Jupiter &amp; Saturn’s orbits to get bigger. It rearranges our entire Solar System.  <br />
<br />
This is part of why we think the Sun isn’t actually going to consume the Planet Earth.  Earth will drift out of range.  So, our orbit will get consumed, but our orbit is just an artificial line around the Sun. Our Planet itself will probably escape.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I think you’re wrong.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Why do you think I’m wrong?</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  The latest article I read:  “The Earth will be destroyed.  The Earth won’t be destroyed.”  I think the last article that we did was the Earth will be destroyed.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> See, I like the Mass loss people.  I’m a firm believer in Mass loss.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Well, no the Mass loss will still happen it’s just that it won’t be enough the Earth will still be destroyed.  Anyway, that’s the current thinking.  [Laughter] We’ll talk in a year and the current thinking will be:  Earth will survive.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, and you know, I’m sure that for every paper written on Earth will be destroyed, an equal number are being written at the exact same rate for Earth will not be destroyed. This is one of the areas of Science that we’re still struggling to understand.  We still don’t know how to calculate Mass loss halfway accurately.  We’re trying to figure it out but it’s a complicated process where you have to understand in detail how Energy is transported through the Sun.  <br />
<br />
It’s a crazy situation where part of the Sun acts like a lava lamp with convection; other parts act more like light bulbs heating up the levels above them through radiative transfer and trying to figure out how all these things happen and how they change as the temperature of the Sun changes.  <br />
<br />
It’s a really complicated process and we’re just starting to get computer software that is sophisticated enough to answer a lot of these questions.  We’re finally starting to get computers that are sophisticated enough to run that software without having to wait a few years for the answer.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right we can just keep coming back and forth with the controversy then.  Five years more of AstronomyCast [Laughter] and you know, we’ll have flipped the position five times.  I think that’s the wonderful thing about Science you know, that it isn’t known. More evidence keeps getting brought to the table and the situation just keeps changing back and forth as more evidence is brought in.  <br />
<br />
As more evidence is thought through and argued and that’s Science and I love that it’s how that all works.  It’s different like should you drink red wine or not? [Laughter] It’s like where you’re changing your drinking habits the fate of the Sun doesn’t really play into the day-to-day habits that I have.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It’s fun to watch how Scientists in general – a lot of us are willing to go yeah we’re not sure what the answer is but I’m going to go with this one because I like it – until we have more solid Science.  <br />
<br />
When I first started studying Astronomy in college we didn’t know what the expansion rate of the Universe was and the choice was 50 or 100.  It was often: “Children use 100, it makes the math easier.”  [Laughter] We now know it’s around 70 kilometers per second per mega parsec.  But I’ll never forget that: “Children use 100, it makes the math easier.” </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Even though it’s completely wrong, could be off by you know…</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> But we didn’t know if it was 50 or 100 and there were people fighting to the death over those two numbers and it turns it was halfway in-between.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> Alright, well I think next week we wanted to look at Stars that are smaller and Stars that are bigger.  The way those events unfold change dramatically depending on the Mass of the Star that you’re dealing with.  <br />
<br />
So we’ll probably go through that whole process again but there’s things that will get a lot more exciting and a lot more boring; mostly more exciting.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> But there will be explosions involved.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> There will be.  Okay we’ll talk to you next week.  </p>
<p> </p></div>
<p><small>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file.  It has been edited for clarity.  Transcription and editing by Cindy Leonard.<br />
</small></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-108-the-life-of-the-sun/' addthis:title='Ep. 108: The Life of the Sun '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-108-the-life-of-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080929.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>We&#039;ve talked about the Sun before, but this time we&#039;re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun, and all the stages it&#039;s going to go through: solar nebula, protostar, main sequence, red giant, white dwarf, and more.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>We&#039;ve talked about the Sun before, but this time we&#039;re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun, and all the stages it&#039;s going to go through: solar nebula, protostar, main sequence, red giant, white dwarf, and more. Want to know what the future holds for the Sun, get ready for the grim details.




Ep. 108: The Life of the Sun
Jump to Shownotes
Jump to Transcript or Download (coming soon!)





Shownotes
Overviews:

	Stellar Life Cycle flow Chart 
	The Life and Death of Stars
	The Natures of the Stars
	Stellar Evolution
	Life Cycle of a Star
	The Life of a Star
	Everything you need to know about the sun from Universe Today&#039;s Guide to Space

And the details...

	Protostars -- from Astrophysics Spectator
	Protostars -- from Wiki
	Hayashi Track -- from Internet Encyclopedia of Science
	Mass-Luminosity Diagram -- from Courtney Seligman
	Paper on the sun&#039;s activity for the past 8,000 years -- from Max Planck Society
	Jupiter gives off more heat than it gets from the sun
	Accretion disk -- from Internet Encyclopedia of Science
	Paper on magnetic fields of stars -- from IAU
	Main sequence stars -- from CSIRO
	Table of main sequence star data
	Nuclear Fusion of Stars -- from Astrophysics Spectator
	Post-Main Sequence Stars and Helium Flash
	Gravitational Collapse of Stars -- Astrophysics Spectator
	Horizontal Branch Stars
	Variable Stars -- from Chandra&#039;s website
	Variable Stars -- see Episode 22 
	Check out American Association of Variable Star Observers
	Mira Variable stars
	Pauli Exclusion Principle
	Diamonds in the sky -- White Dwarf stars
	Globular Clusters
	Will the Earth Survive When the Sun Becomes a Red Giant? -- Universe Today

A few papers on star formation:

	Protostar Formation in the Early Universe
	Properties of Protostars in the Elephant Trunk Globule
	Problems of Star Formation Theories and Prospects of Submillimeter Observations
	Evolution of Massive Protostars with High Accretion Rates

Misc:

	Expansion Rate of the Universe
	Should you drink red wine?
	World Cast, Oct. 4 -- starring Dr. Pamela Gay! &quot;The Origins of the Universe&quot;  Live webcast, 20:00 UT





 
Transcript: The Life of the Sun

Download the transcript

Dr. Fraser Cain: This wasn’t our intention but we’re actually coming up with another series.  We talked about the Sun last time and we’re going to talk about the Sun today and maybe we’ll talk about the Sun next week.  I don’t really know.  

Dr. Pamela Gay: We just have too many big ideas that refuse to be confined to 30 minutes.

Fraser:  I know.  This could be one show, this could be two shows, I don’t really know.

Pamela: We’ll see where we go.

Fraser:  Exactly, we’ll just let the show decide.  We’ve talked about the Sun before.  This time we’re going to look at the entire life cycle of the Sun and all the stages it’s going to go through, Solar Nebula, Protostar, Main Sequence, Red Giant, White Dwarf and more.  So if you want to know what the past held and what the future holds for the Sun get ready for the grim details.  [Laughter] And of course this will always end on a sad note.  

Okay Pamela, I think the goal here today is to go through in excruciating detail all of the stages of the Sun.  It is actually really amazing all the crazy stuff that happens.  So let’s rewind time all the way back to 4.6 billion years ago plus plus and talk about what came first. 

Pamela: Well, once upon a time there was nothing more than a giant cloud of gas and dust.  That’s the boring part.  We don’t know how long that cloud of gas and dust just sorta hung out doing nothing other than maybe glowing faintly.  Somewhere along the line that cloud of gas and dust was caused to contract; caused to fragment and turn itself into a bunch of baby Stars.

Fraser:  Now the key is that it was a cold cloud, right?

Pamela: Yes.

Fraser:  And not a hot cloud.  If you get a hot cloud of gas it will never contract.  

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-107-nucleosynthesis-elements-from-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-107-nucleosynthesis-elements-from-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look around you. Breathe in some air. Everything you can see and feel was formed in a star. Today we&#8217;ll examine that long journey that matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of stars. In fact, the device you&#8217;re using to listen to this podcast has some elements formed in a supernova [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-107-nucleosynthesis-elements-from-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look around you. Breathe in some air. Everything you can see and feel was formed in a star. Today we&#8217;ll examine that long journey that matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of stars. In fact, the device you&#8217;re using to listen to this podcast has some elements formed in a supernova explosion.</p>
<p><span id="more-381"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080922.mp3">Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/nucleo.html">Nucleosynthesis</a> &#8212; Cosmicopia</li>
<li><a href="http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/matter/faq/what-is-an-element.shtml">What is an element? </a> &#8211;from General Chemistry Online</li>
<li><a href="http://www.webelements.com/">The Periodic Table</a></li>
<li><a href="http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=38">Life cycle of a star </a>&#8211; from Cornell University</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-4">Helium 4</a> &#8212; from Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://periodic.lanl.gov/elements/1.html">Hydrogen </a>&#8211; from Los Alamos National Lab</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium">Deuterium </a>&#8211; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis">Big Bang Nucleosynthesis</a> &#8212; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_lithium#Lithium-7">Lithium 7</a> &#8211;Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://www.arpansa.gov.au/RadiationProtection/Basics/alpha.cfm">Alpha Particles</a></li>
<li><a href="http://access.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Stories/FirstStars/Stars1.html">First Glimpse of the First Stars</a> &#8212; from University of Illinois</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/early-universe-had-burst-of-star-formation/">Early Universe Had a Burst of Star Formation</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2004/01/07/lifeless-suns-in-the-early-universe/">Lifeless Suns in the Early Universe</a> &#8212; Universe Today</li>
<li><a href="http://www.sdss.org/news/releases/20030818.metalpoor.html">Metal Poor Galaxies in the Early Universe?</a> &#8212; Sloan Digital Sky Survey</li>
<li><a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/11370">Old Star Sheds Light on the Creation of Elements</a> &#8212; Physics World</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/cno.html">Carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-long-do-stars-usually">How long do stars live? </a>&#8211; Scientific American</li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/triplealph.html">Triple Alpha Process</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/carbon_burning.html">Carbon burning </a>&#8211; from Internet Encylopedia of Science</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-process">R process </a>&#8211; Wiki</li>
<li><a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l2/supernovae.html">Supernova </a>&#8211; Imagine the Universe</li>
<li><a href="http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/supernovae.php">Anatomy of a Supernova -</a>- Cornell U</li>
<li><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080518.html">On the Origin of Gold </a>-  from APOD</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Video:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE9dEAx5Sgw">Carl Sagan&#8217;s Cosmos,</a> &#8220;We are made of starstuff&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J8srN24pSQ">Animation of Crab supernova explosion</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFIvXVMbII0">The Element Song</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Books:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cosmos-Carl-Sagan/dp/0345331354/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1222379271&amp;sr=1-1">Cosmos</a> by Carl Sagan</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Stellar-Evolution-Nucleosynthesis-Clayton/dp/0226109534/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1222379347&amp;sr=1-1">Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis</a> by Donald Clayton</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<h3>Transcript: The Strong and Weak Nuclear Forces</h3>
<div id= "transcript">
 <strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-080922_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Astronomy Cast Episode 107:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars</strong></p>
<p><strong>Fraser Cain:</strong>  I hope everyone by now has heard our little surprise for the feed, which is that we’ve doubled the amount of Astronomy Casts.  So if you like that great, if you don’t like that, let us know.  Hopefully we can grind through more of your questions, which really feels great.  I actually really enjoy doing the shows and I really enjoy listening to them. I don’t know why. I think it’s just some of the cooler concepts come through the questions.  </p>
<p><strong>Dr. Pamela Gay:</strong> Yeah, you guys ask way harder questions than Fraser does.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I know I feel like I should just pass the microphone over. [Laughter] Okay, everyone here it’s your turn.  We’re done with our tour through the basic Forces of the Universe and so now we wanted to get back to some regular Astronomy.  Nothing too complicated this time around.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well that depends on who you talk to.  I think our talk is fairly complicated. </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  All right then, fine.  Something super complicated.  Let’s get on to it.  So look around you.  Breathe in some air.  Everything you can see and feel was formed in a Star.  <br />
<br />
Today we’ll examine the long journey that Matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of Stars.  In fact, the device you’re using to listen to this pod cast has some elements formed in a Super Nova explosion.  <br />
<br />
Just think about that.  I’m sitting here sorta spinning my wedding ring around and thinking it came out of a Super Nova.  <br />
<br />
Okay Pamela, today we’re going to talk about how all of the Matter in the Universe came in one form or another, either from the Big Bang or from Stars or from Super Nova.  I guess at the end it’s all sort of the same environment.  <br />
<br />
I think before we can do that I think it’s important for us to go into what are the Elements and why are they different?  How do you know what’s different from one Element to another?  What differentiates them?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It all comes down to Proton and Neutron number at the end of the day.  The number of Protons tells you what type of Element it is.  So, you have Hydrogen with one Proton; Helium with two Protons and you build your way up through the Periodic Table adding more and more Protons.  <br />
<br />
But the thing is there’s also this thing called a Neutron.  Some Atoms in order to be stable have to have both Protons and Neutrons in the core.  You end up with things like Helium-4 which is a Helium Atom which is number 2 on the Periodic Table. That 4 means that it has four bits, two Protons and two Neutrons sitting in its Nucleus.  Helium-4 is like one of the most stable things that you get.  <br />
<br />
Then we build our way up through the Periodic Table creating heavier and heavier things through different types of processes.  In some cases we just add a Proton and it grows.  In other cases we add a bunch of Neutrons and these Neutrons decide to flip what they are between Protons decaying through a process called the Reverse Beta Decay.  <br />
<br />
This is where the Weak Force gets involved and switches the identity of a Neutron into a Proton while emitting bits of other stuff like an Electron and the anti-Electron Neutrino.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Then what is the definition of an Element?  It’s the Protons?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It’s strictly based off the Protons.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay so one Proton is Hydrogen.  Two Protons is Helium.  Three Protons is Lithium, etc.  So, that’s where you go up with the numbers.  Whenever you see Gold or Lead, the first number is the number of Protons and if you add another Proton, you have a new Element, right?  <br />
<strong>Pamela:</strong> That’s exactly what’s going on.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  But then the Neutron, that’s where you get that number.  Like you say if it’s Carbon-14 you’ve heard about Carbon-14 Dating, that’s where the total number of Protons and Neutrons add up to 14.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And in the case of Carbon you start off with 6 Protons and then to get up to that 14, you add 8 Neutrons to it.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Then those Neutrons can decay you could have six Protons and seven Neutrons and you’d still have Carbon but it just would be different in the number of total little balls at the middle.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah, that’s right.  So, when we talk about Atoms we often use the Periodic Table to figure out how many Protons there are, but in our shortcut language we’ll say things like Lithium-7 where Lithium has 3 Protons in it and Lithium-7 has 3 Protons and an additional 4 Neutrons.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Then all of the things we’re going to be talking about today are the process of adding more Protons or Neutrons, right?  The point being is changing one Element to a different Element through adding Protons.  <br />
<br />
So taking 2 Elements, mashing them together and you get something that is heavier that has more Protons.  It has new characteristics.  So, then the most common Element in the entire Universe is Hydrogen.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And that’s really nothing more than like a Proton by itself that decided to get a friend for an Electron.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay and where did that all come from?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It came from Energy.  [Laughter] When the Universe first formed we were all Energy.  As the Universe cooled and got less dense, eventually that Energy was able to solidify out into Protons.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  This is almost like the discussion we had about the Large Hadron Collider.  The whole Universe, the Big Bang was like a great big Particle Accelerator that turned (to borrow one of your words Pamela) ginormous amount of Energy into Matter.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The Big Bang was sorta the biggest Energy-creating moment of all time and it ended up leading to all the Matter we know.  Originally, all that Matter was just pure Protons and pure Electrons that were happily bouncing off of one another and interacting wildly.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Would that have been Hydrogen at that point or just Protons?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> There you’re starting to get down to sticky names.  A fully ionized Hydrogen Atom is a Proton.  There is Ionized Hydrogen, Proton – same thing.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So it is Protons without Electrons.  So it’s Hydrogen without Electrons.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Pure raw Protons running around the Universe.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So, then what happened?  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> As the Universe cooled about 100 seconds after the Big Bang, we got to the point that the density and the temperature of the Universe kind of resembled the inside of the Sun.  In fact it pretty much exactly resembled the inside of the Sun and we’re able to get these Protons colliding together and in some cases sticking becoming what we call Deuterium. <br />
<br />
One of the Protons would decay into a Neutron and we’d end up with a Proton and a Neutron crammed together and side-by-side with that there’d be a Positron flung off and a Gamma Ray flung off.  <br />
<br />
The nice thing about Deuterium is when it collides with another Hydrogen you start to get Helium.  So you’re starting to build heavier Elements through this process.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  This is exactly the same process that happens inside Stars.  For a few brief moments, the entire Universe was just like one great big Star.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In that one great big Star, we’re able to build up from Hydrogen to Helium and we even got bits of Lithium and Beryllium. One of the really cool things about Big Bang Nucleosynthesis is because when it suddenly shut off we were left with residual Elements that don’t normally end up by themselves in Stars because the process keeps going to completion.  <br />
<br />
Normally you end up with Hydrogen going to Deuterium, going to different species of Helium and eventually building itself up into Beryllium and then to Lithium.  That Lithium generally quickly collides with the Hydrogen and goes into two different Helium-4 Atoms.  <br />
<br />
Because of the way the process was shut off in the Big Bang, we end up with Helium-7 left that didn’t have a chance to end up combining to form 2 Alpha Particles. Alpha Particles is a fancy way of saying Helium-4.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> How long did this process last?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong>  Just 200 seconds, that’s the really cool thing.  All the Lithium-7 in the Universe pretty much was created in 200 seconds.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right.  And even the ratio – what was the final ration?  I think it was like 25 percent of the Universe is now Helium?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Pretty much all the rest is Hydrogen.  There are just trace amounts of Lithium and Beryllium left behind.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, but that all got changed in just 200 seconds.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> If it wasn’t for those 200 seconds who knows what would have happened.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay so then we’ve got a Universe of expanding Hydrogen and Helium and other Trace Elements.  Gravity takes over, starts to pull that material together and starts to form the first Stars.  They were just like balls of Hydrogen, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Right and because they were basically balls of Hydrogen with admittedly 20 something percent Helium, they underwent different characteristics than our current Stars.  They were able to become huge.  We think that some of these Stars were able to get as big as 250 Solar Masses.  One Star 250 times the size of the Sun.  In these Stars they had what we call Proton-Proton reactions.  <br />
<br />
This is pretty much the exact same set of reactions that were going on during the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis.  Eventually, they start to be able to build heavier things.  Eventually they are able to start building Carbon, building Nitrogen.  There are Super Novas – we ended up with heavier Elements over time. But that first generation of Stars, because there was no Carbon around to start the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle which is the next cycle that you get to when you’re done making Hydrogen and Helium, were able to build these giant Stars.  <br />
<br />
They burned quickly and they died quickly and seeded the Universe quickly with heavier Elements.  Once we had those heavier Elements the size Stars that we were able to build changed.  Different types of Nuclear reactions were able to kick in at high temperatures.  <br />
<br />
There is this process called the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen Cycle that once you seed it with Carbon Atoms it’s going to halfway chew away and it does this at the type of temperatures you get with bigger Stars.  <br />
<br />
A lot of times you’ll learn in Astronomy 101 class that all the Stars on the main sequence – Stars that are on a strip through a diagram of brightness and temperature that our Sun sits happily in the middle of, Stars that sit on the main sequence are all burning Hydrogen in their cores.  <br />
<br />
That’s actually not true.  If you get yourself a big enough Star, it will actually start undergoing Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen burning in its core as well.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So, what’s going on?  I think we understand with the Hydrogen burning you’ve got essentially a ball of free Protons there.  Every now and then a Proton is being squished together with an Electron to create a Neutron. And then the Neutrons and the Protons are being pushed together and eventually you end up with Helium Atoms.  I think it takes 4 Protons?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> You start with the Proton-Proton chain.  This is what we have happily going on in our Sun.  In this case you take two Hydrogen Atoms, squish them together and you get what is called the Deuterium.  This is where you have one of the Protons decides it wants to be a Neutron and you give off a Positron and a Neutrino.  <br />
<br />
Then the next stage of this is to take that Deuterium and you smash it into another Proton and you get Helium-3 – a Helium Atom that has 2 Protons and a Neutron and you give off some Gamma Ray light.  <br />
<br />
Then you take 2 of those Helium (you have to let that process go a little bit until you get the 2 Helium), and you smash them together and you get a Helium-4 and 2 Protons go flying off.  Well the problem is, once you have this Helium-4, it really doesn’t want to combine with anything.  <br />
<br />
This was mathematically a serious problem trying to figure out how is it that the Sun keeps going.  How is it that other Stars keep going?  How do you burn this Helium-4? <br />
<br />
 Luckily, the there is something that we call a Resonance that we’re not going to go into a lot of detail on where basically just the right energies and densities to cause Helium-4 to start turning into Beryllium and that Beryllium to start matching up with another Helium-4 to get a Carbon.  <br />
<br />
There is an energy resonance that allows this reaction to happen at about ten to the 8 Kelvin and it’s perfect. It works and we call it the Triple Alpha Process and once you get that Carbon, then you can start, well Carbon mashed into a Proton that gets you Nitrogen.  <br />
<br />
Nitrogen will then decay back into Carbon but a different type of Carbon.  So we’re building things, feeding it through the cycle and we’re starting to get Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen building up in the cores of Stars.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay so that’s the whole point.  You’ve got your Hydrogen going to Helium and then the output of that is then turning into the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle and so you’re boiling down Hydrogen – fluffy Hydrogen into a much more compact oxygen, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And the Stars actually go through fundamental changes as they go from one type of cycle to another.  You take a Star like the Sun and initially it will just burn through all the Hydrogen-producing Helium.  Helium is not hot and dense enough in the core of a Star when it is in the Hydrogen burning phase to get to that C-N-F cycle.  <br />
<br />
Then you go through flashes and you end up with burning the Helium.  It’s a series of events where the Star collapses, changes core temperature, expands back out and you have the Star evolving in radius, evolving in core temperature, evolving in what type of burning is going on. <br />
<br />
As it burns hotter in the core it burns heavier Elements in the core.  It ends up actually creating shells of burning around that hot core as well so you end up with onionskin layers of Nuclear Synthesis. <br />
<br />
 In one part of the Star you’re perhaps creating Silicon while in another you’re still burning Hydrogen into Helium.  You’re just doing it at a higher level of the Star. </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  What would be happening inside our Star?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> A Star like our Sun &#8211; we’re boring.  We’re eventually going to produce Carbon but we’re never going to get to burn the Carbon into something more exciting.  <br />
<br />
You end up needing to have a Star that is about 1.4 times bigger than our Sun.  We’re not there.  But as you grow the Star you’re able to grow the size Element you’re able to build.   </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  That’s interesting.  So if we had a Star that was 1.4 times bigger than the Sun then it would take the Carbon and turn that into something heavy, Nitrogen, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, we’d start ending up getting resultants of Oxygen and Sodium and Magnesium.  So the Carbon burning will start to get us to even more interesting Heavy Elements.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  How far does this process go?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> As you get up eventually to a five Solar Masses Star, that’s when you start to be able to burn Neon.  Out of that you get more Oxygen and more Magnesium. <br />
<br />
With bigger Stars yet at ten Solar Masses you start to get Oxygen burning. At twenty Solar Masses you start to get Silicon burning.  Eventually though you get to the point that through the Silicon-burning process you’re creating Iron through the nuclear burning.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So your output is, like the end of a factory line, Iron is coming out.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The problem that we run into is that with Atoms that are lighter weight than Iron.  When you fuse them together they release Energy.  They are happy to give off Energy through this process.  <br />
<br />
For instance during the Hydrogen-Hydrogen, you end up giving off 1.44 mega-Electron volts of Energy.  So as we produce Helium-4 we’re giving off more than 20 mega-Electron volts through that entire process.  We’re releasing Energy through all these different burning processes.  <br />
<br />
Once you get to Iron in the core, you can’t combine two Iron Atoms.  In fact you can’t combine Iron and anything and have it release Energy.  You have to add Energy into it to get that sort of process to take place.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right and I remember the whole Star is being held up against all that Gravity by the Energy that is coming out of this fusion reaction – the light pressure.  So you’ve now instead of having excess Energy keeping the Star out, you’ve run out of Energy.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> In this case there’s nothing supporting the outer atmosphere of the Star anymore.  So the entire system collapses.  As it collapses you end up with things colliding violently.  You have that Energy getting injected and you’re able to get all sorts of massive reactions going on.  This is in fact a Super Nova.  <br />
<br />
We have Gamma Rays flying out radically.  We have Neutrons flying out radically.  It’s this wash of Neutrons flying through the collapsing atmosphere of the Star that causes what we call the Rapid Process (R-Process).  <br />
<br />
Take a happy little Atom and bombard it with Neutrons and it is going to grow.  If you bombard it with Neutrons fast enough, those Neutrons can’t decay into Protons at a reasonable rate to keep it at a lower Atomic Number.  <br />
<br />
In fact you’re able to build these crazy large Neutron-rich things that will eventually decay into nice stable Atoms.  It’s out of this R-Process that you get Gold, Silver and a lot of the Heavy Metals that we deal with day-to-day.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  How long does that process take?  I know that we’re talking way back when with the Sun that it takes hundreds of thousands of years for the light to get from the core of the Sun to the outside the Sun.  <br />
<br />
It sounds like this whole process, once you get like a train wreck on the one [Laughter] end of the process, it must take time for it to ripple through the system, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Super Nova can have core collapse that takes place in the time scale of milliseconds. It’s going to take time after that for all the radioactive particles that have been created to decay away. <br />
<br />
This is part of what causes the slow decay of the light curve. It is part of the time scale of how long different Super Novas stay at different brightnesses depends on the ratios of the different Elements that occur and how they’re slowly decaying away.  <br />
<br />
But Super Nova themselves, it’s milliseconds with this radical environment of Neutrinos and Neutrons and Gamma Rays all passing out through these collapsing layers of the Atmosphere and creating a shock-wave and pushing things outward.  It’s an amazing process that people are struggling to try and do good three-dimensional models of to understand everything that’s going on.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> But it’s just amazing to think about that, right?  I mean you’ve got a Star – I guess with a Super Nova Star they don’t last very long. Let’s say you’ve got a Star that has lasted for millions of years happily burning, upgrading the stuff that it’s burning you know going up through the Table of Elements and then it hits this wall of Iron. <br />
<br />
It’s just like a brick wall.  Like a car hitting a brick wall.  [Laughter] Milliseconds later, the Star is gone from its previous form.  Black Hole forms – you get the explosion and all these new Elements.  It blows the mind.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> There is one other way to get some of the Heavy Elements.  This is the way like nobody talks about.  I love some of the things that we just propagate basically a Mythology of false information.  <br />
<br />
There’s this thing called the S-Process where there are Neutrons getting produced in the cores of Stars all the time.  In old Massive Stars, you’re producing enough Neutrons in the center of the Star that as Neutrons pass out through the Atmosphere, they’re able to bombard Atoms hanging out in the Atmosphere and get captured.  <br />
<br />
Then they undergo what’s called Inverse Beta Decay where that Neutron converts itself into a Proton and Positron and a Neutrino.  In the process you’re able to build heavier and heavier Elements in the Atmosphere of the Star.  So there is one other way to get at some of the Elements.  This is for instance one of the ways we get at Strontium.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Are you sure that’s it?  I mean that’s it for Stars but what about Black Holes?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, not just Black Holes but also White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars – anywhere you have an Accretion Disk you can end up building up again another situation with the densities and the temperatures are sufficiently high that you can end up with Nuclear Reactions.  <br />
<br />
When you see a Nova, not a Super Nova but a Nova, one of these situations where you have an exploding Accretion Disk, that’s runaway Nuclear Reactions. So there are all sorts of random little extra places that we can start to get heavier Elements emerging.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, so you’ve got material piling up around a Super Massive Black Hole and for just a moment there, the region has the right density and the right temperatures to act like a Star.</p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And with Super Massive Black Holes their Accretion Disks can actually maintain some of this material for fairly long periods of time.  It’s the White Dwarfs that you end up with these short outbursts, these recurring Nova events where essentially the White Dwarf is sitting there, gravitationally sucking Matter off of a nearby companion.  This only happens with binary systems.  <br />
<br />
As it sucks the Matter off, the Matter builds up and builds up until you end up with Explosive Accretion Disks.  Once you’ve cleared it out, the process starts over again and then you suck Matter off, build the disks and build the disks… and it goes off again.  <br />
<br />
So this is again something that has found a model and here it’s complicated because for reasons that we’re still trying to figure out the rate at which White Dwarfs suck Matter off their companion isn’t always constant.  <br />
<br />
The rate at which the Accretion Disks explode isn’t entirely constant.  So there’s lots of neat Physics still waiting to be explored.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay, so let’s run through a couple of examples before we wrap this up.  Just so people can get a sense of the story.  Let’s imagine you have a glass of water – where did the water come from, Hydrogen or Oxygen?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The Hydrogen probably came from the Big Bang.  There’ really nowhere else that you get Protons.  Then the Oxygen probably came from a Star bigger than our Sun.  You can get Oxygen from a Star the size of our Sun but you’re going to get more of it as you start to get bigger Stars.  <br />
<br />
You have to wait for these Stars to die.  During the last years of the biggest Stars, there’s mixing and they breathe out their Atmosphere’s Planetary Nebula.  It’s this breathing out; this exhaling of materials that have been mixed that allows you to get at the Oxygen from the heavier Stars.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So to make a glass of water you had to go to the Big Bang store to get [Laughter] some Protons.  Then also you had to go to an old Massive Star that was sloughing off its outer Atmosphere firing out Oxygen.  Then mix those together and you got water.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And you could also have gotten the Oxygen from Super Nova.  We can’t know exactly where any of them came from.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, right.  Okay what about a tree?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> [Laughter] a tree is mostly Carbon.  So Carbon, again we’re getting this through the exhaling of elderly Stars where they’re breathing out their outer Atmosphere, which has been enriched, with Carbon through different mixing processes.  We’re also getting that from Super Novas.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> And my wedding ring?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> That’s all Super Nova.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser: </strong> Right – only a Super Nova.  It had to come from a Super Nova.  </p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> And that’s kinda cool.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  It’s really cool.  I don’t think my wife would agree but…. [Laughter]  That’s the coolest thing ever.  Well, I think that covers the show for this week.  And now I hope that you’ll look around at all the stuff and even the stuff that you’re made of and you can think back to the famous Carl Sagan quote –we’re all made of Star stuff.
</div>
<p><small>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file.  It has been edited for clarity.  Transcription and editing by Cindy Leonard.</small></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-107-nucleosynthesis-elements-from-stars/' addthis:title='Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/09/ep-107-nucleosynthesis-elements-from-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080922.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Look around you. Breathe in some air. Everything you can see and feel was formed in a star. Today we&#039;ll examine that long journey that matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of stars. In fact,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Look around you. Breathe in some air. Everything you can see and feel was formed in a star. Today we&#039;ll examine that long journey that matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of stars. In fact, the device you&#039;re using to listen to this podcast has some elements formed in a supernova explosion.




Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
Jump to Shownotes
Jump to Transcript or Download (coming soon!)





Shownotes

	Nucleosynthesis -- Cosmicopia
	What is an element?  --from General Chemistry Online
	The Periodic Table
	Life cycle of a star -- from Cornell University
	Helium 4 -- from Wiki
	Hydrogen -- from Los Alamos National Lab
	Deuterium -- Wiki
	Big Bang Nucleosynthesis -- Wiki
	Lithium 7 --Wiki
	Alpha Particles
	First Glimpse of the First Stars -- from University of Illinois
	Early Universe Had a Burst of Star Formation -- Universe Today
	Lifeless Suns in the Early Universe -- Universe Today
	Metal Poor Galaxies in the Early Universe? -- Sloan Digital Sky Survey
	Old Star Sheds Light on the Creation of Elements -- Physics World
	Carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle
	How long do stars live? -- Scientific American
	Triple Alpha Process
	Carbon burning -- from Internet Encylopedia of Science
	R process -- Wiki
	Supernova -- Imagine the Universe
	Anatomy of a Supernova -- Cornell U
	On the Origin of Gold -  from APOD

Video:

	Carl Sagan&#039;s Cosmos, &quot;We are made of starstuff...&quot;
	Animation of Crab supernova explosion
	The Element Song

Books:

	Cosmos by Carl Sagan
	Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis by Donald Clayton



 

Transcript: The Strong and Weak Nuclear Forces

 Download the transcript

Astronomy Cast Episode 107:

Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars

Fraser Cain:  I hope everyone by now has heard our little surprise for the feed, which is that we’ve doubled the amount of Astronomy Casts.  So if you like that great, if you don’t like that, let us know.  Hopefully we can grind through more of your questions, which really feels great.  I actually really enjoy doing the shows and I really enjoy listening to them. I don’t know why. I think it’s just some of the cooler concepts come through the questions.  

Dr. Pamela Gay: Yeah, you guys ask way harder questions than Fraser does.  

Fraser:  I know I feel like I should just pass the microphone over. [Laughter] Okay, everyone here it’s your turn.  We’re done with our tour through the basic Forces of the Universe and so now we wanted to get back to some regular Astronomy.  Nothing too complicated this time around.

Pamela: Well that depends on who you talk to.  I think our talk is fairly complicated. 

Fraser:  All right then, fine.  Something super complicated.  Let’s get on to it.  So look around you.  Breathe in some air.  Everything you can see and feel was formed in a Star.  

Today we’ll examine the long journey that Matter has gone through, forged and re-forged in the hearts of Stars.  In fact, the device you’re using to listen to this pod cast has some elements formed in a Super Nova explosion.  

Just think about that.  I’m sitting here sorta spinning my wedding ring around and thinking it came out of a Super Nova.  

Okay Pamela, today we’re going to talk about how all of the Matter in the Universe came in one form or another, either from the Big Bang or from Stars or from Super Nova.  I guess at the end it’s all sort of the same environment.  

I think before we can do that I think it’s important for us to go into what are the Elements and why are they different?  How do you know what’s different from one Element to another?  What differentiates them?

Pamela: It all comes down to Proton and Neutron number at the end of the day.  The number of Protons tells you what type of Element it is.  So, you have Hydrogen with one Proton; Helium with two Protons and you build your way up through the Periodic Table adding more and more Protons.  

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ep. 103: Electromagnetism</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/08/ep-103-electromagetism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/08/ep-103-electromagetism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our series on the basic forces of the cosmos continues! Last week we discussed gravity, and this we'll handle electromagnetism. Electricity and magnetism are just two aspects of the same force, and you can't talk about astronomy without understanding these two keys aspects of physics. 

<strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080825.mp3">Ep. 103: Electromagnetism</a></strong><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/08/ep-103-electromagetism/' addthis:title='Ep. 103: Electromagnetism '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our series on the basic forces of the cosmos continues! Last week we discussed gravity, and this we&#8217;ll handle electromagnetism. Electricity and magnetism are just two aspects of the same force, and you can&#8217;t talk about astronomy without understanding these two keys aspects of physics.</p>
<p><span id="more-359"></span></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<li><strong><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080825.mp3">Ep. 103: Electromagnetism</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="#shownotes">Jump to Shownotes</a></li>
<li><a href="#transcript">Jump to Transcript</a> or Download (coming soon!)</li>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div id="shownotes">
<h3><a name="shownotes">Shownotes</a></h3>
<ul>
<strong>Electromagnetism</strong></p>
<li><a href="http://www.eas.asu.edu/~holbert/wise/electromagnetism.htm">Electromagnetism</a> from the NSTA</li>
<li><a href="http://www.emtalk.com/">Electromagnetic Forum </a>from EM Talk</li>
<li><a href="http://www.plasma.uu.se/CED/Book/">Classical Electrodynamics</a> online textbook</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.solarnavigator.net/compass.htm">History of the Magnetic Compass</a></li>
<li><a href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/st-elmo-fire.htm">St. Elmo&#8217;s Fire</a> from How Stuff Works</li>
<li><a href="http://amasci.com/elect/elefaq.html">FAQ&#8217;s on electricity</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mig.rssi.ru/mirrors/stern/Education/Imagnet.html">Magnetism</a> by Dr. David Stern</li>
<li><a href="http://www.astronomynotes.com/evolutn/s12.htm">Info on charged particles in stars generating magnetic fields</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Maxwell.html">James Clerk Maxwell</a></li>
<li><a href="http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/MaxwellEquations.html">Maxwell&#8217;s four equations</a> from Wolfram Research</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/mhd.htm">Magnetohydrodynamics</a></li>
<li><a href="http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/active/smblack.html">Jets from supermassive black holes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_(unit)">Teslas</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.particleadventure.org/other/othersites.html">List of Particle Physics websites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae24.cfm?CFID=8135477&amp;CFTOKEN=50635567">Photoelectric Effect</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.particleadventure.org/frameless/unified.html">Grand Unified Theory</a></li>
<li><a href="http://arxiv.org/html/physics/9908024">Abstract on the Unified Theory</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Books:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Classical-Electrodynamics-Third-David-Jackson/dp/047130932X">Classical Electrodynamics by John David Jackson</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Electrodynamics-3rd-David-Griffiths/dp/013805326X/ref=pd_sim_b_3">Introduction to Electrodynamics by David J. Griffiths</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Electrodynamics-Advanced-Book-Classics/dp/0201360756/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220022623&amp;sr=1-7">Quantum Electrodynamics by Richard P. Feynmann</a></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<h3>Transcript: Electromagnetism</h3>
<div id="transcript">
<strong><a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/transcripts/AstroCast-080825_transcript.pdf">Download the transcript</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Fraser Cain:</strong>  Yeah and you’re off to Dragon Con.  I know we’ve been saying this over and over again, but this is it.</p>
<p><strong>Dr. Pamela Gay:</strong>  I’m going to be at Dragon Con and there will be an International Year of Astronomy booth over in the Marriott Hotel and Pod casting science space and a whole lot more over in the Hilton.  <br />
<br />
I even got myself onto one of the Star Wars panels where we’re going to be talking about, “Could the Star Wars Galaxy really happen?”  It’s going to be a fun packed week and I’ll have all the details up on my blog probably Wednesday or Thursday.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Alright and Phil’s going to be there and all the folks from Skepticality.  It’s going to be a lot of cool people there.  I get to take a week off because you’ll be recording the show, so it will be great.  <br />
<br />
Actually it probably won’t be a week off because we’ll probably do our show next week and then we’ll probably post the Dragon Con show the week after that.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> We’ll see what happens.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Yeah we’ll figure it out.  There will be something every week forever.  All right well let’s move on.  Our series on the basic forces of the universe continues.  Last week we covered gravity and this week we’ll handle electromagnetism. <br />
<br />
You probably know electricity and magnetism are just two facets of the same force and they play a huge role in some of the most energetic places in the Universe.  You can’t talk Astronomy without understanding these.  <br />
<br />
All right Pamela so we’re ready for Part 2.  I’m going to guess we learned about magnetism first so maybe you should give us just a little bit of background.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Well, the fact that these are forces is one of those things that confused us for no end.  There was first this whole that there are rocks out there that can pick up other rocks and they cause attraction and repulsion and this was just highly confusing.  <br />
<br />
But, it allowed us to do things like build compasses. Compasses were probably one of the most useful things right after fire in terms of helping human beings expand out across the planet. Compasses allow us to find our way across water. With society growing up around the Mediterranean, being able to navigate by sea was kind of important.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I guess that must have been a pretty amazing discovery to think that you’d float a little piece of metal or rock on water and it will always point in the same direction.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> You’ve got to wonder what sort of magic and gods and all sorts of other mythology was involved with that.  It’s something that we didn’t really understand until the 1800s, but we’ve known about for basically forever.  That’s just one of the strange, why do things fall?  Well they do.  Well why do magnet’s needles point north, well they do.  <br />
<br />
It took a long time to sort it out. Trying to bring magnetism and electricity together was one of those things that actually first started to happen out at sea. Sailors were being subjected to St. Elmo’s fire, to lightning, to all of these electrical effects and noticing in the midst of all of this chaos that their compass needles are going haywire too.  <br />
<br />
Here you know how these poor superstitious sailors, who don’t have the education to know any better, watching their magical compass needles spin crazily, watching their masts start to glow with built up electric charge and then quite often all of this leads in their ship getting struck with lightning.<br />
<br />
They had to have evoked all sort of craziness and now we have the science to explain the craziness. The moral is you don’t want to be the tallest thing on the ocean during a storm.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So from electricity, how did they start to understand that?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> There are all sorts of neat things but it often all boils down to cat fur and amber, or wool and amber.  There are different things you can do to build up static electricity.  This can lead you to doing all sorts of neat experiments.  <br />
<br />
For instance, if you rub cat fur on amber or plastic you can start to build up charge. You can transfer this charge if you have a metal cylinder.  One really neat experiment we do in a lot of freshman physics courses is we take a metal cylinder with a piece of glass on both ends of it. <br />
<br />
Going into the metal cylinder we usually have a little finger of metal with a piece of foil attached to it.  There’s usually an insulator of some sort to protect the piece of foil from the little metal finger going into the cylinder.  <br />
<br />
If you rub plastic with wool and then touch the metal cylinder it will deposit charge and you can do this over and over and over again. Very slowly as the charge builds up you can start to deflect the small piece of foil in the center.  This is the type of experiment that they could have done a couple hundred years ago.  </p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Actually I have a great experiment for every one. If you want to pause the pod cast.  Find something long and plastic like a knitting needle or something like a straw. Rub it against cotton or wool ideally and then turn on your water off your tap really lightly so you have a thin little stream coming down. <br />
<br />
Once you’ve rubbed the plastic with the wool hold it right next to the stream of water and you will actually find the water bend sideways.  It freaks the kids out. [Laughter]</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The reason that works is because there’s charge in the water.  It’s not all neutral and you’re actually getting attraction. That’s a really cool demo I’m now going to have to try with my students.  I didn’t know about that particular demo.  <br />
<br />
There are all sorts of neat little things you can do with electricity and magnetism.  For a couple hundred years all sorts of people including perhaps most famously here in the United States, Benjamin Franklin, looked for all sorts of different ways to experiment with electricity and find new and interesting ways to hurt themselves in some cases.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  How do they get the sense that they were connected?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This whole lightning strikes and compass needle goes crazy was indicative that there was something going on.  You can actually start to generate electric current through wires by using magnetic fields.  If you have a moving magnetic field near charge then you can get the charge to move too.  It’s one of those cool things.  <br />
<br />
Take a loop of wire move a magnet through the wire and you’ll end up getting current moving through the wire.  This is in part how generators work.  You take and you either rotate the wire around the magnets or the magnets around the wires and you can start generating all sorts of different types of current depending on how you have the wires set up.  There’s this clear, physical, tangible experimental evidence that something is going on.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Right, so once again I think the experiment reads you take a coil of wire and then you move a magnet through the middle of the coil and assuming you have a light bulb on the end of it, the light bulb will glow every time you move the magnet in and out of the coil of wire.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> The other thing is once you start figuring out how to generate electricity, if you run electricity around and around a coil; that generates a magnetic field.  You have two different sides of a coin facet to this where magnet going through wire generates electricity, electricity going through coil of wire generates magnetic field.  <br />
<br />
This is actually in part what’s happening in stars.  We don’t so much have a coil of wires, but instead there are plasmas (charged particles) moving in circular motions around the insides of stars and this motion of the charged particles generates magnetic fields. That’s what leads to sun spots eventually, that’s what leads to the Earth’s magnetic field.  <br />
<br />
Everything seems to come down to what happens when you take an electron, what happens when you take a proton, what happens when you take a calcium atom that’s missing a few electrons.  What happens when you get this charge moving is you get magnetic fields.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Back to my question, how do they come together?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It all came down to a rather brilliant man by the name of Maxwell who was working on trying to figure out how to mathematically pull all of these pieces together.  We had laws describing mathematically how magnetism worked. We had laws describing mathematically how electricity worked. <br />
<br />
Maxwell sat down and realized that all these sets of equations could be brought together into a single formalism that combined both the electricity and the magnetism through basically four different equations.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So we’ve got then four different equations that then allow you to calculate how the electricity and the magnetism in some situation are going to be interacting.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It all comes down to, “How do charged particles move and how do magnetic fields change?”  If either of these two things is happening, if either a charged particle is moving or the strength of the magnetic field is changing, you’re going to generate electric fields. You’re going to generate magnetic fields and you’re going to get all sorts of neat secondary effects.  <br />
<br />
One of the things we don’t think about as we’re wiring up our houses is if you had direct current, if you had current that was always flowing in one direction and somewhere in your house and you ended up with too much wire and you coiled it up you could end up with small pockets of magnetism in your house.  <br />
<br />
As it is with alternating current, we can still end up with small pockets of magnetism but the direction of the magnetic field is constantly changing so that’s not as likely to do weird things to your house.  <br />
<br />
If you leave a nail inside of a magnetic field that’s constant for too long you can actually transform that nail into a magnet because over time that magnetic field can actually change the alignment of the atoms in the nail.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Let’s bring it back to Astronomy then.  What role does electromagnetism play in some of the biggest forces in the universe?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Magnetic fields are pretty much where it’s at.  One of the scariest parts of the field of astrophysics is something called magneto-hydro dynamics.  It’s the study of basically, if you have stuff that’s acting like a liquid and there’s charge in it, it generates magnetic fields, let’s describe this in three dimensions using fancy computer models.  It’s probably the most complicated thing to try and study.  <br />
<br />
It’s necessary because things like the accretion discs around Black Holes generate magnetic fields. Stars generate magnetic fields.  The faster rotating the star, the stronger the magnetic field.  When we pull all of these pieces together, it leads to side effects.  <br />
<br />
There are jets.  The jets of a Super Massive Black Hole are nothing more than the North and South Pole of a giant magnet and particles are getting streamed out that northern and southern pole.  Charges are getting carried along and flung out the ends.  These are violent, violent behaviors.  <br />
<br />
Hyper nova and gamma ray bursts, are considered to be in part, driven again by jets potentially again driven by magnetic fields.  Where there’s violence, quite often there are magnetic fields.  Understanding these things allows us to understand some of the coolest most high-energy events hanging out scattered around the Universe.  <br />
<br />
Then there are just low-level magnetic fields that could have different effects on galaxy formation.  We’re still working to try to figure this out.  We know that there are magnetic fields permeating through Galaxies. We’re still working to figure out how does that effect star formation. <br />
<br />
How does that effect the streaming of material that’s getting spit out as super novas shock the nebula that they sit within?  We’re still sorting all of these secondary things out and we have to understand the magnetic fields to understand what’s happening.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I know one of the more recent theories about Super Massive Black Holes is that those jets that are coming out of them are helping to see the Galaxy and help collapse star formation and seed some of the heavier elements.  Those big magnetic fields operating from the Super Massive Black Holes might have a big impact as well.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> It’s basically like a giant magnetic sprinkler head.  We have all of these nuclear reactions going on generating heavier and heavier particles and they are not neutral.  <br />
<br />
They don’t have enough electrons to balance out all of their protons in a lot of these extremely hot dense environments. Any time a particle is charged it’s susceptible to magnetic fields.  <br />
<br />
So it’s possible that these Super Massive Black Holes can basically scoop up the charged particles, shoot them out through the magnetic fields and let them rain back down on the Galaxy.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Can we get a sense of scale here?  We’ve got a bar magnet or the Earth’s magnetic field, how does that compare to say the magnetic field of the Sun or a Pulsar or something like that?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Here on the surface of the Earth your standard bar magnet can totally overwhelm the effects of the Earth’s magnetic field or of this little tiny magnetic field.  It’s like order of a few tens of a few micro-teslas.  It’s not that big.  We can generate in the lab thousands of teslas if we feel like it.  <br />
<br />
The Sun is measured in micro-teslas. It’s about a hundred more powerful in general.  Once you start getting out to some of the bigger things out there such as Pulsars, Neutron Stars that are rotating quickly, accretion discs and things like that you can start to get to thousands of times stronger, tens of thousands of times stronger. <br />
<br />
In fact the magnetic field of magnatars, are measured not in micro-teslas but measured in giga-teslas.  The micros are like fractions and fractions and fractions of teslas where as the giga is billions of teslas.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So we’re talking trillions of times more powerful than the Earth.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yeah.  You might say that we really don’t want to be anywhere close to a magnatar.  When the magnetic fields and magnatars rearrange themselves there is so much energy involved that, one that did this on the other side of the center of the Milky Way a few years ago was actually able to damage satellites orbiting the Earth because it let off so many high energy particles, so many high energy gamma rays.  There’s a lot of energy tied up in all of these magnetic fields.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Okay I’m going to channel my six year old daughter here for a second and ask the kinds of questions that she would I’m sure would want to know.  I just have to say why?  Why is there magnetism and electricity?  What is the underlying reality at work here?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> At first glance it’s the way the universe was built.  When you start looking at the way particle physics describes it all of these forces are immediated by different particles. <br />
<br />
So last week with the force of gravity we had the graviton running back and forth being – you, you be attracted to this and pulling things together.  With the electromagnetic force we both have things flying apart and coming together.  That’s one of the really cool things about the electromagnetic force. <br />
<br />
Just like with gravity, the electromagnetic force can work over huge distances. Just like the electromagnetic force it gets weaker with distance.  It turns out that just like the force of gravity, the electromagnetic force has a mass-less particle running around going – you go over here, you come over here and in this case that particle happens to be the photon, the particle of light.  <br />
<br />
When you have two magnets repelling each other across the table you don’t see a beam of light going back and forth between the two of them.  This is where we start talking about exchange particles and virtual particles.  <br />
<br />
Mathematically we describe everything with the exchange of photons but that’s not actually something we’re generally going to see. We can actually see how light effects matter.  The electromagnetic force is the one that holds together pretty much everything around us.  <br />
<br />
The reason I’m not falling through the chair I’m sitting on is because the electromagnetic force is bonding all the atoms together with covalent and ionic bonds, which is just a fancy way of saying different atoms are sharing electrons.  <br />
<br />
The reason that I am able to stretch some things and fold others is because of the fluidity of how the atoms are bonded together. All of these things are determined through the electromagnetic force and I can start to change things.  <br />
<br />
I can start to remove electrons; I can start to basically change how atoms are structured to the point of even causing fusion if I just hit them with enough light.  <br />
<br />
This was part of the photoelectric effect that Einstein got his first Nobel Prize for.  If I shine a nice happy red light on a piece a metal there is a pretty good chance that I can beam that piece of metal all day long and not necessarily get any electrons flying off.  <br />
<br />
If I change the color of that light and change it more to the blue and more to the blue and more to the blue making the light higher and higher energy, eventually I’m going to start knocking electrons off of those atoms.  <br />
<br />
What was realized is that light, while appearing to be this stream of flowing color is actually not waves but individual particles. Each packs an individual little punch where red light carries less of the punch than blue light.  <br />
<br />
Atoms have electrons that are held in place and with a certain amount of energy can get knocked to a new place.  Just like having ten million little puppies butting their little heads against my leg is probably only going to make me slightly bruised and ten million pit bulls will cause me to fall violently to my knees, the blue light is perfectly capable of moving electrons. <br />
<br />
Whereas the red light just causes the electrons to go, “Yeah, so go on, do your best.”  It’s that energy that can cause electrons to get removed from atoms.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So how do the photons relate to the magnetism and the electricity?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> They work to carry the force.  Here is where it starts to sound more like magic than science unless you start getting into the nitty gritty quantum mechanics of all of it.  <br />
<br />
The photons basically working as virtual particles getting evoked in lots of fine diagrams are going back and forth communicating from one electron to another; you too should be repelling one another.  Communicating from one electron to one proton, you two should be attracting one another.<br />
<br />
In this way they are the carriers of the force.  They are the ones that communicate what’s going on and through their motion at the speed of light they are also able to communicate in some ways the distance between things.  <br />
<br />
Magnetic fields don’t move instantly.  If I move a magnet it’s going to take the magnet that’s interacting with it time, the amount of time it takes a photon to move from one magnet to the next to realize that there has been a change in the force it’s experiencing.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So magnetism works at the speed of light just like we know electricity goes at the speed of light.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Yes, so we have gravity, we have electricity and we have magnetism, all traveling at the speed of light because they are communicated by particles with no mass.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So when you said that everything that we see in the Universe, all the light that we see, all of the forces that are holding together the atoms that we see, the molecules, that’s all electromagnetism.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> That’s all electromagnetism with gravity sometimes mixing it up a little bit.  We have gravity out there changing the color of light, changing the path of the light. But the structures we see are all electromagnetism.  The structures we’re sitting on, our computers, all of that is electromagnetism.  <br />
<br />
Everything that allows the computer, the I-Pod the I-River, the whatever it is you are listening to us on to function.  All of that is described through electromagnetism.  Through various sets of rules that define how circuits work, and how one charged electron interacts with different properties in atoms.  <br />
<br />
This is perhaps one of the most complicated forces.  Gravity is quite happy to say, you have mass, okay I’m going to pull on you.  With electromagnetism you start to get into the individual characteristics of different atoms.  <br />
<br />
You look at what are the geometries of the electrons? What is the susceptibility of a particular substance to having its electrons moved around?  <br />
<br />
Electrons move readily in metals.  Metals become magnets. Metals conduct electricity. All of these things are united together. At the same, pick take up a hunk of wood and it could care less if you have a magnetic field or a flow of electricity.  It’s just going to sit there and be wood and refuse to conduct and refuse to repel and refuse to attract.  <br />
<br />
It’s all the electromagnetic force and the structure of atoms define how that electromagnetic force is able to do all the amazing things that it does.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  All right so let me see if I understand this correctly.  I could take for example a magnet pulling on some other magnet onto some piece of metal and I could turn that into electricity, right, either by moving the magnets through the wire or whatever.  <br />
<br />
I could turn that electricity into light or also magnetism here or I could use that electricity or magnetism to knock electrons off of some atoms to make them either stick together or break apart and this is all just the same force acting?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> This is all the same force even down to light bulbs where when you try and get electricity to flow through things that are more resistive to its flow like carbon filaments.  <br />
<br />
The friction is the wrong word, but it’s the one people try to use, don’t say friction.  The resistance of that carbon fiber to having the electricity flow through it is going to cause the atoms to move, to heat up, and to generate light. <br />
<br />
That’s again electromagnetism where as the electricity flows through something that conducts easily, a normal every day wire, to moving through something that is resistive like a filament we generate light.  <br />
<br />
All of these things are electromagnetism and it all boils down to the structure of the material the electricity is attempting to flow through or the magnetic field it is attempting to interact with.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  Now we’re treating it as a separate force from gravity. Is there any inter-relation between electromagnetism and gravity, or are we not ready for that yet?</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> No, we wish we understood how these two things could come together, we don’t.  At the earliest moments in the first fractions of a fraction of a fraction of a second of the Universe, all the forces were one.<br />
<br />
Then gravity went off and went its own way.  The other three forces hung out together for a while and electromagnetism is not related to gravity.  Gravity can affect how light changes, but magnetism and electric forces are their own happy little things.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  So I guess we’re going to have to wait until the last part of this series where we win our Nobel Prize [Laughter] to unite the forces.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Exactly.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  All right, well we’ll look forward to that then.  Be patient everyone, that’s coming.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> We condensed the entire topic of four college courses into 30 minutes. So if we were vague and we didn’t dig into details it’s because I don’t have a blackboard.  There are some excellent books out there.  <br />
<br />
There’s E &amp; M by Griffith if you ever really want to learn more about E &amp; M than your calculus-knowing mind thought it wanted to know. If you really hate yourself, Jackson’s E &amp; M is a book that has put the fear of E &amp; M into pretty much all grad students who have studied physics at one point or another.</p>
<p><strong>Fraser:</strong>  I don’t think that people really understood how it’s all inter-connected. Pretty much all of the things you are interacting with are all generated from this one force in different facets. In fact we talked about this before, that you can take light and freeze it into matter.</p>
<p><strong>Pamela:</strong> Exactly.  We talk about quantum mechanics as if it was dealing with its own separate little set of forces.  It’s not.  Quantum mechanics deals in part with how the electromagnetic forces dictate how electrons move. <br />
<br />
It deals with how light is generated, how things come together, and how electrons are able to go through different potential wells, how fusion and fission, how all of these different things are able to take place.  <br />
<br />
This is all electromagnetism and it took quantum mechanics to explain how all of these different things come together.</p>
<p><strong>Frazer:</strong>  We’ve got two more forces to go so I think that will be maybe one maybe two more weeks.  I don’t know how much we have to talk about.  <br />
<br />
Thanks Pamela and maybe there will be a Dragon Con episode next week, it’s all going to be a mystery so stay tuned, we’ll figure it out.</p>
<p> </p></div>
<p><small>This transcript is not an exact match to the audio file.  It has been edited for clarity.  Transcription and editing by Cindy Leonard.</small>
</div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/08/ep-103-electromagetism/' addthis:title='Ep. 103: Electromagnetism '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomycast.com/2008/08/ep-103-electromagetism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-080825.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Our series on the basic forces of the cosmos continues! Last week we discussed gravity, and this we&#039;ll handle electromagnetism. Electricity and magnetism are just two aspects of the same force, and you can&#039;t talk about astronomy without understanding t...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Our series on the basic forces of the cosmos continues! Last week we discussed gravity, and this we&#039;ll handle electromagnetism. Electricity and magnetism are just two aspects of the same force, and you can&#039;t talk about astronomy without understanding these two keys aspects of physics. 

Ep. 103: Electromagnetism</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Astronomy Cast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

