Welcome to Astronomy Cast, the most popular astronomy-related podcast. Just look at what listeners have to say about it:
Astronomy Cast is out of this world! It's hard to believe that it's free! This is an absolute must for any amateur astronomer or anyone interested in astronomy or cosmology. The hosts, Pamela and Fraser, are fun to listen to, extremely knowledgeable, and are able to explain difficult subject matter with great analogies. Bravo!
"Very interesting and almost "easy" for amateurs to listen and understand"
Check out the iTunes review page with hundreds of 5 star reviews.
As you know, we wanted to answer listener questions regularly, but we found it was taking away from the regular weekly episodes of Astronomy Cast. So we've decided to just split it up and run the question shows separately from the regular Astronomy Cast episodes. If this works out, you might be able to enjoy twice the number of Astronomy Cast episodes. So if you've got a question on a topic we cover in a recent show, or you just have a general astronomy question, send it in to info@astronomycast.com. Either by email, or record your question and email in the audio file.
In the above-linked Discussion of the bowling-ball-rubber-sheet model, the author concludes that Einstein was wrong and that Newtonian physics still prevails. I doubt that this is what you meant to tell us.
He is taking the analogy too literally, as if the fabric of space-time was a physical medium being curved by gravity. There are other logical fallacies as well, but I haven't the space here to address them.
After watch I think a Nova show and heard that dark energy is 73%, dark matter 23% and 4%the rest known matter…why am I the only one to notice that the Sun is 73% Hydrogen 23% helium 4% metals….happy oddity?
Also would all orbit energy of all orbiting mass add up in some math way to the 220,000 m/s the sun orbits the milky way thus showing a way to know when all orbiting mass is known or % known….so it dont collide with earth…
Empyre-
That was obviously the wrong link! I've put in a better one and added a link to the Gravity Probe B site that has an interactive bowling-ball-rubber-sheet model.
September 20th, 2008 at 7:15 am
In the above-linked Discussion of the bowling-ball-rubber-sheet model, the author concludes that Einstein was wrong and that Newtonian physics still prevails. I doubt that this is what you meant to tell us.
He is taking the analogy too literally, as if the fabric of space-time was a physical medium being curved by gravity. There are other logical fallacies as well, but I haven't the space here to address them.
September 21st, 2008 at 12:56 am
After watch I think a Nova show and heard that dark energy is 73%, dark matter 23% and 4%the rest known matter…why am I the only one to notice that the Sun is 73% Hydrogen 23% helium 4% metals….happy oddity?
Also would all orbit energy of all orbiting mass add up in some math way to the 220,000 m/s the sun orbits the milky way thus showing a way to know when all orbiting mass is known or % known….so it dont collide with earth…
September 22nd, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Empyre-
That was obviously the wrong link! I've put in a better one and added a link to the Gravity Probe B site that has an interactive bowling-ball-rubber-sheet model.
Thanks,
Nancy