<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions Show: Galileoscope, Black Hole Time, and What Exactly is Energy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/</link>
	<description>Take a weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos with Astronomy Cast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SWL</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator>SWL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=793#comment-2485</guid>
		<description>I heard your question on tidal heating by the moon, so I did a back of the envelope calculation.  It is pretty small.  I posted here:  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvuBuS61O1XFIsLjDFi9NTHsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090727090349AARkJnY

Wiki also has some stuff as shown by the cite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard your question on tidal heating by the moon, so I did a back of the envelope calculation.  It is pretty small.  I posted here:  <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvuBuS61O1XFIsLjDFi9NTHsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090727090349AARkJnY" rel="nofollow">http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvuBuS61O1XFIsLjDFi9NTHsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090727090349AARkJnY</a></p>
<p>Wiki also has some stuff as shown by the cite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJenbo</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>AJenbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=793#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>Infrared will pass straight threw cola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infrared will pass straight threw cola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=793#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Kevin.  The only reason I really noticed this is because I subscribe to several podcasts and to help organize I created a smart playlist that lists all new unheard podcasts in reverse order of release date.  I&#039;m always a few weeks behind, but I use this to listen to the different podcasts I follow in order of date.  So, it&#039;s weird when a new astronomy cast shows up and it&#039;s near the bottom of the list even though it&#039;s the newest and should be at the top.

Anyway, I understand recording things ahead of time, that makes sense, I guess I just need to get used to the dates in iTunes.  In some ways actually having the old dates makes sense since anything that happened in the world since the recording date obviously would be unknown to the hosts and not taken into account in their podcast.  :)  So, if I want my unhead postcasts to truly be played in historical chronological order, then this is actually correct.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Kevin.  The only reason I really noticed this is because I subscribe to several podcasts and to help organize I created a smart playlist that lists all new unheard podcasts in reverse order of release date.  I&#039;m always a few weeks behind, but I use this to listen to the different podcasts I follow in order of date.  So, it&#039;s weird when a new astronomy cast shows up and it&#039;s near the bottom of the list even though it&#039;s the newest and should be at the top.</p>
<p>Anyway, I understand recording things ahead of time, that makes sense, I guess I just need to get used to the dates in iTunes.  In some ways actually having the old dates makes sense since anything that happened in the world since the recording date obviously would be unknown to the hosts and not taken into account in their podcast.  <img src='http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   So, if I want my unhead postcasts to truly be played in historical chronological order, then this is actually correct.  <img src='http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Wakley</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Wakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=793#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>As a regular listener I&#039;d like to help clear up the question raised by the first comment.

As I understand it the aim is to release the shows regularly, optimally on a weekly basis. When they are recorded is a different matter!

As Pamela has a busy schedule, and is often on the road, it&#039;s not uncommon for multiple episodes to be recorded at the same time. If you listen to a few shows you&#039;ll hear Frazer making comments about this. The shows may be released, however, over a couple of weeks and not at the same time. A show recorded on a given date may take a few weeks until it&#039;s finally released.

I must admit that I find this also a little off-putting at times. If you&#039;re aware of the problem then it&#039;s not too big a deal. 

I think this problem could be cleared by saying &#039;recorded on&#039; when saying the date. By saying &#039;the show for..&#039; it&#039;s a little confusing. Either that or plan ahead and know before recording when the show will be released, and use this date instead? 

I know that the Skeptic&#039;s Guide to the Universe suffers from the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a regular listener I&#039;d like to help clear up the question raised by the first comment.</p>
<p>As I understand it the aim is to release the shows regularly, optimally on a weekly basis. When they are recorded is a different matter!</p>
<p>As Pamela has a busy schedule, and is often on the road, it&#039;s not uncommon for multiple episodes to be recorded at the same time. If you listen to a few shows you&#039;ll hear Frazer making comments about this. The shows may be released, however, over a couple of weeks and not at the same time. A show recorded on a given date may take a few weeks until it&#039;s finally released.</p>
<p>I must admit that I find this also a little off-putting at times. If you&#039;re aware of the problem then it&#039;s not too big a deal. </p>
<p>I think this problem could be cleared by saying &#039;recorded on&#039; when saying the date. By saying &#039;the show for..&#039; it&#039;s a little confusing. Either that or plan ahead and know before recording when the show will be released, and use this date instead? </p>
<p>I know that the Skeptic&#039;s Guide to the Universe suffers from the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjornar</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomycast.com/listeners/questions-shows/questions-show-galileoscope-black-hole-time-and-what-exactly-is-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjornar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomycast.com/?p=793#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>Im a regular listener to this show. and I&#039;d like to share something that came attached to the latest issue of the Norwegian magazine Astronomi.

-What is energy? What is a force?

Jørgen Karlsen is introducing a new theory which unifies all forces of nature, -Forces by Proxy. 

http://www.principlephysics.com/

Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im a regular listener to this show. and I&#039;d like to share something that came attached to the latest issue of the Norwegian magazine Astronomi.</p>
<p>-What is energy? What is a force?</p>
<p>Jørgen Karlsen is introducing a new theory which unifies all forces of nature, -Forces by Proxy. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.principlephysics.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.principlephysics.com/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
